Beránková J, Veselý P, Sýkorová J, Fuchs R. The role of key features in predator recognition by untrained birds. Anim Cogn. 2014;17:963–71.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Brunton DH. Fatal antipredator behavior of killdeer. Wilson Bull. 1986;98:605–7.
Google Scholar
Burger SJ. Differential responses of tropical roseate terns to aerial intruders throughout the nesting cycle. Condor. 1992;94:712–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Caro TM. Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2005.
Google Scholar
Courter JR, Ritchison G. Alarm calls of tufted titmice convey information about predator size and threat. Behav Ecol. 2010;21:936–42.
Article
Google Scholar
Crisologo TL, Bonter DN. Defending the weak: parental defense peaks when chick vulnerability is greatest in the herring gull Larus argentatus. Ethology. 2017;123:113–22.
Article
Google Scholar
Curio E. The adaptive significance of avian mobbing. I. Teleonomic hypotheses and predictions. Z Tierpsychol. 1978;48:175–83.
Google Scholar
Curio E, Regelmann K, Zimmermann U. The defence of first and second broods by great tit Parus major parents: a test of predictive sociobiology. Z Tierpsychol. 1984;66:101–27.
Article
Google Scholar
Evans C, Macedonia J, Marler P. Effects of apparent size and speed on the response of chickens, Gallus gallus, to computer-generated simulations of aerial predators. Anim Behav. 1993;46:1–11.
Article
Google Scholar
Fasanella M, Fernández GJ. Alarm calls of the southern house wren Troglodytes musculus: variation with nesting stage and predator model. J Ornithol. 2009;150:853–63.
Article
Google Scholar
Fuchs R, Veselý P, Nácarová J. How to study predator recognition. In: Fuchs R, Veselý P, Nácarová J, editors. Predator recognition in birds. The use of key features. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2019.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Ghalambor CK, Martin TE. Parental investment strategies in two species of nuthatch vary with stage-specific predation risk and reproductive effort. Anim Behav. 2000;60:263–7.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ghalambor CK, Martin TE. Fecundity-survival trade-offs and parental risk-taking in birds. Science. 2001;292:494–7.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kleindorfer S, Fessl B, Hoi H. Avian nest defence behaviour: assessment in relation to predator distance and type, and nest height. Anim Behav. 2005;69:307–13.
Article
Google Scholar
Krams I, Krama T. Interspecific reciprocity explains mobbing behaviour of the breeding chaffinches, Fringilla coelebs. Proc R Soc B. 2002;269:2345–50.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kryštofková M, Haas M, Exnerová A. Nest defence in blackbirds Turdus merula: effect of predator distance and parental sex. Acta Ornithol. 2011;46:55–63.
Article
Google Scholar
Liang W, Møller AP. Hawk mimicry in cuckoos and antiparasitic aggressive behavior of barn swallows in Denmark and China. J Avian Biol. 2015;46:216–23.
Article
Google Scholar
Lima SL. Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation. Biol Rev. 2009;84:485–513.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lima SL, Rattenborg NS, Lesku JA, Amlaner CJ. Sleeping under the risk of predation. Anim Behav. 2005;70:723–36.
Article
Google Scholar
Liu J, Yang C, Yu J, Wang H, Liang W. Egg recognition in Cinereous Tits Parus cinereus: eggshell spots matter. Avian Res. 2019;10:37.
Article
Google Scholar
Mahr K, Riegler G, Hoi H. Parental risk management in relation to offspring defence: bad news for kids. Proc R Soc B. 2015;282:20141670.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Martin TE. Avian life-history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food. Ecol Monogr. 1995;65:101–27.
Article
Google Scholar
Martin TE, Li PJ. Life history traits of open- vs cavity-nesting birds. Ecology. 1992;73:579–92.
Article
Google Scholar
Matthysen E. The Nuthatches. London: T & AD Poyser Ltd A & C Black; 1998.
Google Scholar
Maziarz M, Piggott C, Burgess M. Predator recognition and differential behavioural responses of adult wood warblers Phylloscopus sibilatrix. Acta Ethol. 2018;21:13–20.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
E M, Wang T, Wang S, Gong Y, Yu J, Wang L, Ou W, Wang H. Old nest material functions as an informative cue in making nest-site selection decisions in the European Kestrel Falco tinnunculus. Avian Res. 2019;10:43.
Article
Google Scholar
Møller AP, Díaz M, Liang W. Brood parasitism and proximity to human habitation. Behav Ecol. 2016;27:1314–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ. Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Q Rev Biol. 1988;63:167–87.
Article
Google Scholar
Nad’o L, Kašová M, Krištín A, Kaňuch P. Cooperative nest-defence behaviour and territory quality in a resident and socially monogamous passerine. Ethology. 2018;124:514–26.
Article
Google Scholar
Newton I. The role of nest-sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: a review. Biol Conserv. 1994;70:265–76.
Article
Google Scholar
Piao G, Wang S, Piao Z. The mammals of Changbai Mountain. Changchun: Jilin Science and Technology Press; 2013.
Google Scholar
Polak M. Comparison of nest defence behaviour between two associate passerines. J Ethol. 2013;31:1–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Rice WR. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution. 1989;43:223–5.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ricklefs RE. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smith Contrib Zool. 1969;9:1–48.
Article
Google Scholar
Ritchison SG. The nest defense behavior of eastern screech-owls: effects of nest stage, sex, nest type and predator location. Condor. 1993;95:288–96.
Article
Google Scholar
Smith JM. Parental investment—a prospective analysis. Anim Behav. 1977;25:1–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Solheim R. Caching behaviour, prey choice and surplus killing by Pygmy owls Glaucidium passerinum during winter, a functional response of a generalist predator. Ann Zool Fenn. 1984;21:301–8.
Google Scholar
Sordahl TA. The risks of avian mobbing and distraction behavior: an anecdotal review. Wilson Bull. 1990;102:349–52.
Google Scholar
Strubbe D, Matthysen E. Experimental evidence for nest-site competition between invasive ring-necked parakeets Psittacula krameri and native nuthatches Sitta europaea. Biol Conserv. 2009;142:1588–94.
Article
Google Scholar
Sun Y, Wu H, Yao J, Jiang Y. The defensive effect of reduced hole size on the predator in Sitta europaea. J Northeast Normal Univ (nat Sci). 2017;49:123–6.
Google Scholar
Suzuki TN. Parental alarm calls warn nestlings about different predatory threats. Curr Biol. 2011;21:R15–6.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Suzuki TN. Assessment of predation risk through referential communication in incubating birds. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10239.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Swaisgood RR, Owings DH, Rowe MP. Conflict and assessment in a predator–prey system: ground squirrels versus rattlesnakes. Anim Behav. 1999;57:1033–44.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Templeton CN, Greene E, Davis K. Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science. 2005;308:1934–7.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Trivers RL. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B, editor. Sexual selection and the descent of man. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company; 1972. p. 136–79.
Google Scholar
Wesołowski T. Anti-predator adaptations in nesting Marsh Tits Parus palustris: the role of nest-site security. Ibis. 2002;144:593–601.
Article
Google Scholar
Wesołowski T, Rowiński P. Breeding behaviour of Nuthatch Sitta europaea in relation to natural hole attributes in a primeval forest. Bird Study. 2004;51:143–55.
Article
Google Scholar
Yorzinski JL, Platt ML. The difference between night and day: antipredator behavior in birds. J Ethol. 2012;30:211–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Yorzinski JL, Vehrencamp SL. The effect of predator type and danger level on the mob calls of the American crow. Condor. 2009;111:159–68.
Article
Google Scholar
Yu J, Wang L, Xing X, Yang C, Ma J, Møller AP, Wang H, Liang W. Barn swallows Hirundo rustica differentiate between common cuckoo and sparrowhawk in China: alarm calls convey information on threat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2016;70:171–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Yu J, Lv W, Xu H, Bibi N, Yu Y, Jiang Y, Liang W, Wang H. Function of note strings in Japanese Tit alarm calls to the Common Cuckoo: a playback experiment. Avian Res. 2017a;81:22.
Article
Google Scholar
Yu J, Xing X, Jiang Y, Liang W, Wang H, Møller AP. Alarm call-based discrimination between common cuckoo and Eurasian sparrowhawk in a Chinese population of great tits. Ethology. 2017b;1238:542–50.
Article
Google Scholar
Yu J, Lu H, Sun W, Liang W, Wang H, Møller AP. Heterospecific alarm-call recognition in two warbler hosts of common cuckoos. Anim Cogn. 2019;226:1149–57.
Article
Google Scholar
Yu J, Sun W, Liang W, Wang H, Møller AP. Differently sized cuckoos pose different threats to hosts. Curr Zool. 2020;66:247–53.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar