Skip to main content
Download PDF

Optimal diet strategy of a large-bodied psittacine: food resource abundance and nutritional content enable facultative dietary specialization by the Military Macaw

Avian Research volume 10, Article number: 38 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Dietary specialization should arise when there is a relatively high abundance of a particular resource, where animals may select food items to obtain an optimal diet that maximizes energy intake. Large-bodied psittacines frequently exhibit a narrow dietary niche with specific habitat use, but few studies have determined whether psittacines select food resources, and how this influences habitat use.

Methods

We established fruiting phenology transects to evaluate food resource availability for the large-bodied Military Macaw (Ara militaris) in semi-deciduous, deciduous, and pine-oak forest at two sites along the coast of Jalisco, during the dry season when macaws are nesting. We also determined Military Macaw diet by observations of foraging macaws along transect routes, and conducted bromatological analysis of the nutritional content of the most consumed resource.

Results

Military Macaws used six plant species as food items during the dry season, and had a narrow dietary niche (Levins’ B = 0.28), with 56% of foraging macaws consuming the seeds of Hura polyandra. No food resources were recorded in pine-oak forest during the dry season, with food resources and foraging by macaws concentrated in tropical deciduous and semi-deciduous forest, where H. polyandra was the most abundant fruiting tree species. When considering the proportional availability of food resources, we determined a broad Hurlbert dietary niche breadth of H = 0.67, indicating that Military Macaws consumed food resources according to their availability. Furthermore, the seeds of H. polyandra were an important source of protein, carbohydrates, minerals and moisture, and the hard fruit-casing means that these seeds are exclusively available for macaws.

Conclusions

By concentrating their diet on the most abundant resources, Military Macaws may increase foraging efficiency in the dry season. The high nutrient content also means that concentrating the diet on seeds of H. polyandra may be an optimal foraging strategy for Military Macaws to meet their energy requirements during the breeding season.

Background

Optimal foraging theory predicts that animals should forage in the most efficient manner to maximize fitness (MacArthur and Pianka 1966; Krebs and Davies 1984). One aspect of this is the selection of an optimal diet, where animals select food items in the diet to maximize energy intake (Pyke et al. 1997). In this sense, animals may feed on the most abundant resource, or in areas with a high abundance of resources (Charnov 1976; Martin 1985). Furthermore, a high abundance of one resource relative to other resources is likely to lead to dietary specialization (Schoener 1971; Pyke et al. 1997). Therefore, food specialization may be determined by the relative abundance of food resources, as well as metabolic, behavioural, and nutritional aspects of resource use (Stephens and Krebs 1986).

Psittaciformes (parrots) have been reported to consume a variety of plant species in the diet (Renton et al. 2015); although foraging may be concentrated on a few resources giving a narrow dietary niche (Renton 2001, 2006; Matuzak et al. 2008). In particular, large-bodied psittacines exhibit a narrow dietary niche with specific habitat use (Ragusa-Netto and Fecchio 2006; Matuzak et al. 2008). These large-bodied parrot species tend to consume a greater proportion of seeds in the diet (Matuzak et al. 2008), and have the capacity to consume both hard and soft fruits (Galetti 1997).

Large macaws consume an average of 15 plant species in the diet (range 4‒48 plant species), although many studies report that macaws concentrate foraging on just 1‒3 tree or palm species (Pitter and Christiansen 1995; López-Lanús 1999; Bonadie and Bacon 2000; Ragusa-Netto 2006; Renton 2006; Matuzak et al. 2008; Contreras-González et al. 2009; Santos and Ragusa-Netto 2014). Only a few studies have evaluated the proportional use of food resources by macaws, and these have determined a narrow dietary niche of Levins’ B = 0.12‒0.39 for various species of large macaws (Ragusa-Netto 2006; Renton 2006; Matuzak et al. 2008; Contreras-González et al. 2009; Santos and Ragusa-Netto 2014). Therefore, large macaws may present specialized diets concentrated on the seeds of only a few plant resources, but it is unclear whether these also represent the most abundant food items.

Few studies have evaluated food resource selection by parrots in the wild (Renton et al. 2015), although some parrot species have been found to adjust dietary niche with fluctuations in food resource abundance (Renton 2001; Matuzak et al. 2008; Boyes and Perrin 2009a; Botero-Delgadillo et al. 2010), and the Ouvea Parakeet (Eunymphicus uvaeensis) selects in the diet plant species that have relatively constant fruit abundance throughout the year (Robinet et al. 2003). Food resource abundance is also one of the main factors influencing habitat use by birds (Block and Brennan 1993), and parrots have been shown to demonstrate habitat shifts in association with food resource abundance enabling them to track food resource availability (Greene 1998; Renton 2001).

Resource requirements is one of the least known aspects of psittacine ecology (Renton et al. 2015), and such information may indicate the characteristics making some species more vulnerable to human pressures, while other species are able to adapt to human modified habitats (Saunders and Ingram 1987; Saunders 1990, 1991). This is especially important for Psittaciformes, which is one of the most threatened avian families (Bennett and Owens 1997; Olah et al. 2016).

The Military Macaw (Ara militaris) is the most northerly distributed macaw occurring from Mexico to northern South America (Forshaw 1989). Little is known of Military Macaw diet, although the species may have a narrow dietary niche (Contreras-González et al. 2009), and appears to concentrate the diet on specific plant resources in the distinct geographic areas of its range (Juárez et al. 2012). The Military Macaw also demonstrates fluctuations in abundance among habitat types in association with variations in food resource availability (Morales-Pérez 2005; Muñoz-Lacy 2014). Timing of nesting by the Military Macaw varies notably in different regions of the species’ range in Mexico (Juárez et al. 2012), which could be due to regional variations in temperature and precipitation that affect food resource availability.

On the coast of Jalisco, Military Macaws initiate nesting in late November to December, with chick rearing occurring during the dry season months of January to April (Carreon-Arroyo 1997). During this period, the Military Macaw was observed foraging mainly in trees of Hura polyandra (Loza-Salas 1997), suggesting that this tree species provides important resources for macaw reproduction. However, it is not known whether the Military Macaw exhibits dietary selection by specializing on specific food resources during the breeding season, how this relates to resource abundance, and whether this influences habitat use by macaws. Therefore, we aimed to determine (1) the composition of Military Macaw diets and proportional use of resources during the breeding season, (2) the nutritional content of the most consumed resource, (3) whether the Military Macaw exhibits food resource selection based on the relative abundance of resources, and (4) how food resource abundance influences habitat used for foraging.

Methods

Study site

We conducted the study during the Military Macaw breeding season in the dry season months of March to April 2013 at two sites along the northern coast of Jalisco, Mexico. The first site known as Cajón de Peñas (19°59′24″ to 20°02′54″N, and 105°01′30″ to 105°07′12″W) is located in the Tomatlan Municipality, and the second site El Tuito (20°16′12″ to 20°29′24″N, and 105°24′54″ to 105°40′12″W) is located in Cabo Corrientes Municipality on the coast of Jalisco. The northern coast of Jalisco has an annual rainfall of 1624‒2500 mm (García-Oliva et al. 1991), with mean yearly temperature of 24.6‒28 °C (Sandoval 1992; SIEG 2012). There is a marked rainy season from June to October, followed by a dry season from November to May. The region has mountainous terrain from sea-level to 1920 m (SIEG 2012). The main vegetation at the study sites was semi-deciduous forest dominated by Brosimiun alicastrum, Enterolobium cyclocarpum, Hura polyandra, and Sabal mexicana, and deciduous forest dominated by Bursera instabilis, Spondius purpurea, Heliocarpus pallidus, Cochlospermum vitifolium and Guazuma ulmifolia (Rzedowski 2006). Pine-oak forest also occurred on higher terrain, and was dominated by Quercus glauscens, Curatella americana and Encyclia trachycarpa (Rzedowski 2006).

Food resource availability

We established a total of 22 phenology transects of 200 m × 4 m (Chapman et al. 1994), distributed among three vegetation types, with nine transects in deciduous forest, eight in semi-deciduous forest, and five in pine-oak forest. Transects were surveyed during March and April 2013 in the dry season, recording all fruiting trees with a diameter at breast height (DBH) > 10 cm. For each fruiting tree we measured DBH and estimated fruit abundance on the tree using a ranking scale of categories ranging from 1‒4 based on the percent of canopy with fruits (Bullock and Solís-Magallanes 1990), where 1 = up to 25% of canopy with fruits, 2 = 25% to 50% fruit cover, 3 = 50% to 75% fruit cover, and 4 = 75% to 100% of the canopy with fruit. We also classified fruits based on color as immature, mature or dried. We used four estimators of resource availability for each transect: (1) the number of tree species fruiting, (2) total number of fruiting trees, (3) the sum of DBH of fruiting trees, and (4) sum of the fruit abundance ranking for trees in each transect.

Military Macaw diet

The use of food resources in the diet was determined by direct observations of foraging macaws. Feeding observations were performed in the same area and at the same time as the phenology transects, including occasional adhoc observations while conducting field work. On encountering foraging macaws, we recorded the location, habitat type, plant species, plant part consumed, stage of ripeness, and number of macaws foraging. To determine dietary niche we considered the number of macaws observed foraging on each food item. However, to determine habitat use we considered the frequency of foraging records, or feeding bouts, of macaws (single or group) on each tree species (Galetti 1993).

Nutritional analysis

We collected fruits at the stage of ripeness in which they are consumed by macaws, from three trees of Hura polyandra at Cajon de Peñas. Fruits were maintained in refrigeration and taken for bromatological analysis of nutritional content of the seeds at the Animal Nutrition Laboratory of the Facultad de Medicina, Veterinaria y Zootecnia at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). The white seed kernel was extracted and analyzed to determine percent crude protein, lipids, fiber, ash, and humidity (Cunniff 1995). Mineral concentration of magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), iron (Fe), potassium (K) and calcium (Ca) was also determined using an Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (Skoog et al. 2008).

Data analysis

To determine dietary specialization in use of food resources by the Military Macaw, we calculated dietary niche breadth using the standardized Levins niche breadth index (Levins 1968; Krebs 1989), where a value close to 0 indicates dietary specialization and a value close to 1 indicates a broad diet (Colwell and Futuyma 1971). To determine selection of resources based on availability, we applied the Hurlbert (1978) index of niche breadth that estimates dietary niche considering the proportional use of each food resource with respect to the proportional availability of that resource. In this case, a value close to 0 indicates the selection of resources with limited availability in the environment, while a value close to 1 indicates that resources are being used according to their availability. We compared proportional use and availability of each item in the diet of Military Macaws using simultaneous Bonferroni 95% confidence intervals (Neu et al. 1974; Byers et al. 1984).

We used data from the phenology transects to determine food resource abundance and availability for Military Macaws by habitat. We defined food resources available to Military Macaws based on our field observations of foraging macaws, and considered as potential food resources tree species that are consumed by Military Macaws throughout the species’ distribution (Juárez et al. 2012), as well as tree species consumed by other macaw species (Vaughan et al. 2006; Renton 2006; Berg et al. 2007), where these occurred at our study sites (Loza-Salas 1997; Morales-Pérez 2005). During the survey period, we recorded no fruiting trees consumed by macaws in pine-oak forest; therefore, we only compared food resource availability between tropical deciduous and semi-deciduous forest, where we registered fruiting trees. Kolmogorov–Smirnov analysis demonstrated a normal distribution for the variables of number of fruiting trees, sum of DBH of fruiting trees, and sum of fruit abundance ranking per transect. Therefore, we applied two-sample t-tests to compare each estimator of food resource availability for Military Macaws between deciduous and semi-deciduous forest.

Finally, we used Chi square test to determine whether frequency of foraging by Military Macaws corresponded with that expected based on the number of fruiting trees that provide food resources for macaws in each habitat. Descriptive statistics are presented with mean and standard deviation, and we considered p < 0.05 as significant for statistical analyses.

Results

Habitat-wide food resource abundance and availability

In the 22 phenology transects, we recorded a total of 193 fruiting trees of 24 species from 20 families that could provide food resources for macaws. Only nine tree species recorded more than 5% of all fruiting individuals in transects, with Hura polyandra (19% of fruiting trees) being the most abundant fruiting tree species (Fig. 1). No food resources for Military Macaws were recorded in pine-oak forest during the months of March and April in the macaw breeding season. For tropical deciduous and semi-deciduous forest, food resource availability for Military Macaws was generally greater in semi-deciduous forest (Table 1), but this was only significant for sum of DBH of fruiting trees (Table 1). In general, we recorded different tree species in each forest type. However, six tree species were recorded fruiting in both deciduous and semi-deciduous forest: Hura polyandra, Annona palmeri, Enterolobium cyclocarpum, Bursera simaruba, Ficus spp., and Orbignya guacuyule, the first four of which were among the most abundant fruiting trees in transects (Fig. 1), contributing to the similarity in food resource availability between these two tropical forest vegetation types.

Fig. 1
figure1

Total abundance of fruiting tree species recorded in phenology transects that potentially provide food resources for Military Macaws (only species that represent > 5% of fruiting trees in phenology transects are shown)

Full size image
Table 1 Mean (± SD) per transect for estimators of food resource availability for Military Macaws in tropical deciduous and semi-deciduous forest at two sites along the coast of Jalisco in the dry season
Full size table

Military Macaw diet

We observed the Military Macaw consuming six food resources during the dry season when macaws were nesting. Seeds were the main component of the diet, although macaws also consumed fruits of Eugenia capuli, the mesocarp of Orbignya guacuyule fruits, and leaf stems of the epiphyte Anthurium halmoorei. Military Macaws presented a narrow dietary niche during the dry season with Levins’ B = 0.289, indicating a specialized diet, where the main food item was immature seeds of Hura polyandra consumed by 56% of foraging macaws, followed by seeds of Brosimum alicastrum, although these were consumed by only 30% of individuals (Table 2).

Table 2 Dietary items consumed by the Military Macaw during the dry season months of March and April 2013, at two sites along the coast of Jalisco
Full size table

Bromatological analysis of the main item in macaw diets demonstrated that unripe seeds of Hura polyandra have a high percent of crude protein, lipids, and humidity (Table 3). Mineral analysis also found a high concentration of Magnesium and Potassium in seeds of Hura polyandra (Table 3).

Table 3 Mean (± SD) nutritional content of unripe seeds of Hura polyandra from three trees at Cajon de Peñas, Jalisco, Mexico
Full size table

Food resource selection by Military Macaws

When we evaluated whether Military Macaws selected food items consumed in the diet, we obtained a broad Hurlbert dietary niche of H = 0.674. This indicates that the Military Macaw consumed resources in the diet according to their proportional abundance (Fig. 2). Hence, although Military Macaws consumed predominantly seeds of Hura polyandra, this was the most abundant food resource for macaws (Fig. 2). Comparison of proportional use and availability of each item in the Military Macaw diet, using simultaneous Bonferroni 95% confidence intervals, showed that only in the case of Bursera simaruba seeds of this tree species were consumed by Military Macaws significantly less than expected by the availability of fruiting trees (Observed proportion = 0.03, Confidence Intervals: 0–0.10, Expected proportion = 0.32; Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Proportional use and availability of fruiting tree species consumed in Military Macaw diets during the dry season at two sites along the coast of Jalisco. *p < 0.05: observed use differs significantly from that expected by availability

Full size image

Finally, we recorded Military Macaws foraging more frequently in semi-deciduous forest (n = 27 records) compared to deciduous forest (12 records). Semi-deciduous forest also had a greater number of 126 fruiting trees compared to 67 fruiting trees in deciduous forest, and the frequency of foraging by macaws was similar to that expected based on the number of fruiting trees in each habitat type (χ2 = 0.27, ns).

Discussion

Diet and food resource selection by Military Macaws

The Military Macaw consumed predominantly immature seeds, as has been determined for other large parrot species (Galetti 1993; Gilardi 1996; Renton 2001, 2006; Matuzak et al. 2008; Gilardi and Toft 2012). The use of seed resources may be in part influenced by the nutritional quality of food resources as seeds are higher in protein and lipids than other plant parts (Gilardi and Toft 2012). Hence, a predominantly seed diet may enable large macaws to more efficiently meet their daily energy requirements, as larger bird species require greater amounts of protein for body maintenance and growth (Klasing 1998; Koutsos et al. 2001). This may be of greater relevance during the breeding season when protein content is essential both for adult maintenance and for nestling growth (Koutsos et al. 2001).

Furthermore, even though we recorded 24 fruiting tree species that could potentially provide food resources for macaws at the study sites, the Military Macaw exhibited a specialized diet during the dry season when macaws are nesting, with a narrow dietary niche concentrated on the seeds of only a few plant resources. Studies of a variety of macaw species have determined that they exhibit narrow dietary niche breadths, concentrated on 1‒3 tree species (Ragusa-Netto 2006; Renton 2006; Matuzak et al. 2008; Contreras-González et al. 2009; Santos and Ragusa-Netto 2014). This differs from smaller parrot species that have a broad dietary niche (Matuzak et al. 2008; Boyes and Perrin 2009b).

In particular, the Military Macaw concentrated foraging on immature seeds of Hura polyandra, which was the most abundant food resource available for macaws. Lozas-Salas (1997) also noted that Military Macaws at the Cajon de Peñas study site consumed predominantly seeds of H. polyandra. Furthermore, we determined that the seeds of H. polyandra were high in protein and lipid content, and percent protein in seeds of H. polyandra was similar to that found for seed oil of the related species H. crepitans (Okolie et al. 2012; Abdulkadir et al. 2013). Seeds of H. polyandra also had high mineral concentrations, particularly of magnesium and potassium, similar to that found in seed oil of H. crepitans (Okolie et al. 2012; Abdulkadir et al. 2013), although iron, which is one of the high concentration minerals in seed oil of H. crepitans (Okolie et al. 2012; Abdulkadir et al. 2013), had very low concentration in unripe seeds of H. polyandra. Finally, in contrast with seed oil of H. crepitans (Okolie et al. 2012; Abdulkadir et al. 2013), the unripe seeds of H. polyandra had high moisture content. This makes the seeds of H. polyandra a valuable source of protein, energy, minerals and water during the dry season when Military Macaws are raising young.

The next frequently consumed item of Brosimum alicastrum has been found to contain lower 15.4% to 15.9% crude protein (Plata et al. 2009; Montes-Pérez et al. 2012). Similarly, while Bursera simaruba was the second most abundant fruiting tree species, seeds of this tree species were consumed by Military Macaws significantly less than expected, and have been found to contain a low 12.4% crude protein (Plata et al. 2009). Large parrot species require at least 10‒15% protein for maintenance, and require > 20% protein for nestling growth (Koutsos et al. 2001). The lower protein content in the seeds of Brosimum alicastrum and Bursera simaruba may explain why they are consumed less frequently by Military Macaws during the breeding season when macaws are raising young.

Therefore, seeds of Hura polyandra represent an abundant and highly nutritious food resource, which may enable greater dietary specialization by the Military Macaw during the breeding season. The use of food resources with a high protein and lipid content may permit consumers to obtain their nutrient requirements from just a few resources. The European Serin (Serinus serinus) exhibits a similar dietary specialization on the seeds of Diplotaxis virgata during the breeding season, which was accounted for by the high protein and energy content of the seeds, rather than food resource availability (Valera et al. 2005). The Glossy Black-Cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus lathami) in Australia also has a specialized diet consuming the seeds of two species of Allocasuarina trees, which have very high 43.5% protein and 38% lipid content (Crowley and Garnett 2001).

However, seeds also have high levels of toxicity (Gilardi and Toft 2012), and seeds of Hura polyandra are extremely toxic (López-Bazán 2002). No other bird species were observed to consume seeds of H. polyandra, possibly due to the thick, hard capsule protecting seeds, and their toxicity. The absence of competitors makes this a potentially exclusive, highly nutritious food resource for Military Macaws, which along with the high abundance of H. polyandra at the study sites, would facilitate dietary specialization (Schoener 1971; Pyke et al. 1997).

Moreover, the broad Hurlbert niche breadth indicates that the Military Macaw consumed food resources according to their availability. Hence, although the Military Macaw consumed predominantly the seeds of Hura polyandra, this was the most abundant food resource during the dry season. Indeed, H. polyandra has been determined as the main food resource for Military Macaws in the dry season by different studies at this site over a span of 20 years (Loza-Salas 1997; Morales-Perez 2005; Muñoz-Lacy 2014). This suggests that abundant fruiting of H. polyandra, and resource consumption by macaws, is an annually repeated pattern at this site, and makes the seeds of H. polyandra a reliable food resource for nesting macaws. Concentrating the diet on the most abundant resources, that may also provide high energy intake, could be the most efficient foraging strategy for macaws, and highlights the importance of considering both food resource availability and nutritional value when evaluating dietary requirements.

Habitat-wide food resource availability

During the Military Macaw breeding season on the coast of Jalisco, we registered food resources for macaws only in lowland tropical semi-deciduous and deciduous forests, with a tendency for higher food resource availability in semi-deciduous forest. Military Macaws were recorded foraging in both forest types, but with greater frequency in semi-deciduous forest, as expected by the number of fruiting trees. This may be due to the fact that the main item of macaw diets, Hura polyandra, was the most abundant fruiting tree species, and occurred in both forest types at the study site. Foraging where there are more fruiting trees may enable the Military Macaw to forage more efficiently, rather than expend energy searching for new resource patches. Finally, we found no food resources available for Military Macaws in pine-oak forest during our study, although Military Macaws have been reported to consume seeds and fruits of Oak trees (Juárez et al. 2012).

It is possible that food resource availability is not the main factor influencing habitat use by the Military Macaw during the breeding season, given that macaws did not demonstrate food resource selection, but consumed mainly the most abundant resources. On the other hand, Military Macaws are highly selective of nest-sites using cavities in large, mature trees characteristic of primary semi-deciduous forest, which occur at a low density (de la Parra-Martínez et al. 2015). Therefore, availability of nest-sites may define the use of specific habitats or areas by macaws during the breeding season, with macaws exploiting the most abundant food resource available in those areas.

The characteristics of the Military Macaw as a large psittacine species that concentrates the diet on only a few food resources during the breeding season, and with highly selective nest-site requirements (de la Parra-Martínez et al. 2015), makes the species more susceptible to habitat loss, or the decline of key food resources. Hura polyandra is a tree species characteristic of semi-deciduous forests (Pennington and Sarukhan 2005), which are undergoing high rates of conversion and fragmentation in Mexico (de Jong et al. 2010). The potential reduced availability or loss of a key food resource such as H. polyandra as a result of habitat fragmentation may have consequences for reproductive output of the Military Macaw, and the maintenance of wild populations. Military Macaws have been extirpated from previous parts of their range in Mexico as semi-deciduous forests become increasingly fragmented. It is important therefore to implement conservation strategies to maintain semi-deciduous forest habitats required by macaws for nesting (de la Parra-Martínez et al. 2015), and tree species such as H. polyandra that constitutes a key food resource for Military Macaws in the dry season when macaws are raising young.

Conclusions

Our results determined that the Military Macaw had a narrow dietary niche during the dry season, concentrating the diet on the most abundant tree species of Hura polyandra that also provided seeds with high nutrient content. The reliability and abundance of fruiting, as well as its high nutritional content, suggests that H. polyandra is a key food resource for Military Macaws during the breeding season. H. polyandra is distributed throughout the range of the Military Macaw in Mexico (Pennington and Sarukhan 2005). Therefore, it may be that H. polyandra is an important food resource during the breeding season of the Military Macaw in other areas of the species’ range. Notably, the Military Macaw has been observed consuming seeds of H. polyandra during the breeding season in Sinaloa (Rubio 2015) and Nayarit (Puebla-Olivares et al. 2018) in Mexico, while H. crepitans is reported in the diet of the Military Macaw in South America (Juárez et al. 2012). Moreover, the Military Macaw has been found to concentrate the diet on one or a few specific plant resources in distinct geographic areas of its range (Juárez et al. 2012). It may be therefore, that the Military Macaw is a facultative dietary specialist, concentrating the diet on the most abundant, nutritious resource, to increase foraging efficiency and energy intake for adult survival and reproductive success.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting conclusions of this article are included within the manuscript.

References

  1. Abdulkadir MN, Isiaka AA, Adeniyi OA. Chemical composition of Hura crepitans seeds and antimicrobial activities of its oil. Int J Sci Res (Ahmedabad). 2013;2:440–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett PM, Owens IPF. Variation in extinction risk among birds: chance or evolutionary predisposition? Proc R Soc Lond B. 1997;264:401–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berg KS, Socola J, Angel RR. Great Green Macaws and the annual cycle of their food plants in Ecuador. J Field Ornithol. 2007;78:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Block WM, Brennan LA. The habitat concept in ornithology: theory and applications. Curr Ornithol. 1993;11:35–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonadie WA, Bacon PR. Year-round utilisation of fragmented palm swamp forest by Red-bellied Macaws (Ara manilata) and Orange-winged parrots (Amazona amazonica) in the Nariva Swamp (Trinidad). Biol Conserv. 2000;95:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Botero-Delgadillo E, Verhelst JC, Paéz CA. Ecología de forrajeo del periquito de Santa Marta (Pyrrhurra viridicata) en la Cuchilla de San Lorenzo, Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta. Ornitol Neotrop. 2010;21:463–77.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boyes RS, Perrin RM. The feeding ecology of Meyer’s Parrot Poicephalus meyeri in the Okavango Delta Botswana. Ostrich. 2009a;80:153–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyes RS, Perrin RM. Generalists, specialists and opportunists: niche metrics of Poicephalus parrots in southern Africa. Ostrich. 2009b;80:93–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bullock SH, Solís-Magallanes J. Phenology of canopy trees of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Biotropica. 1990;22:22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Byers CR, Steinhorst RK, Krausman PR. Clarification of a technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. J Wildl Manage. 1984;48:1050–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carreón-Arroyo G. Estimación poblacional, biología reproductiva y ecología de la nidificación de la Guacamaya Verde (Ara militaris) en una selva estacional del oeste del estado de Jalisco. B.Sc. Thesis. Mexico City: Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 1997.

  12. Charnov EL. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol. 1976;9:129–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chapman CA, Wrangham R, Chapman LJ. Indices of habitat-wide fruit abundance in tropical forests. Biotropica. 1994;26:160–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Colwell RK, Futuyma DJ. On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology. 1971;52:567–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Contreras-González AM, Rivera-Ortíz FA, Soberanes-González C, Valiente-Banuet A, Arizmendi MC. Feeding ecology of Military Macaws (Ara militaris) in a semi-arid region of Central Mexico. Wilson J Ornithol. 2009;121:384–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Crowley GM, Garnett ST. Food value and tree selection by Glossy Black-Cockatoos Calyptorhynchus lathami. Austral Ecol. 2001;26:116–26.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cunniff P. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 16th ed. Arlington: AOAC International; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. De Jong B, Anaya C, Masera O, Olguín M, Paz F, Etchevers J, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions between 1993 and 2002 from land-use change and forestry in Mexico. Forest Ecol Manag. 2010;260:1689–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. de la Parra-Martínez SM, Renton K, Salinas-Melgoza A, Muñoz-Lacy LG. Tree-cavity availability and selection by a large-bodied secondary cavity-nester: the Military Macaw. J Ornithol. 2015;156:489–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Forshaw JM. Parrots of the world. 3rd ed. Willoughby: Landsdown Editions; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Galetti M. Diet of the Scaly-headed Parrot (Pionus maximiliani) in a semi-deciduous forest in southeastern Brazil. Biotropica. 1993;25:419–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Galetti M. Seasonal abundance and feeding ecology of parrots and parakeets in a lowland Atlantic forest of Brazil. Ararajuba. 1997;5:115–26.

    Google Scholar 

  23. García-Oliva F, Ezcurra E, Galicia L. Pattern of rainfall distribution in the central Pacific coast of Mexico. Geogr Ann A. 1991;73:179–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gilardi JD. Ecology of parrots in the Peruvian Amazon: habitat use, nutrition and geophagy. Ph.D Thesis. Davis: University of California; 1996.

  25. Gilardi JD, Toft CA. Parrots eat nutritious foods despite toxins. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e38293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Greene TC. Foraging ecology of the Red-crowned Parakeet (Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae novaezelandiae) and Yellow-crowned Parakeet (C. auriceps auriceps) on Little Barrier Island, Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. N Z J Ecol. 1998;22:161–71.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hurlbert SH. The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives. Ecology. 1978;59:67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Juárez M, Marateo G, Grilli PG, Pagano L, Rumi M, Silva-Croome M. Estado del conocimiento y nuevos aportes sobre la historia natural del guacamaya verde (Ara militaris). Hornero. 2012;27:5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Klasing KC. Comparative avian nutrition. Wallingford: CAB International; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Krebs CJ. Ecological methodology. New York: Harper and Row; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Koutsos EA, Matson KD, Klasing KC. Nutrition of birds in the order Psittaciformes: a review. J Avian Med Surg. 2001;15:257–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Krebs JR, Davies NB. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. 2nd ed. Malden: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Levins R. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  34. López-Bazán TF. Envenenamiento con semillas de Hura polyandra (haba de San Ignacio). Rev Mex Med Urg. 2002;2:61–4.

    Google Scholar 

  35. López-Lanús B. The biology of Great Green Macaw Ara ambigua in southwest Ecuador. Papageienkunde. 1999;3:147–69.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Loza-Salas CA. Patrones de abundancia, uso de hábitat y alimentación de la guacamaya verde (Ara militaris), en la presa Cajón de Pena, Jalisco, Mexico. B.Sc Thesis. Mexico City: Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 1997.

  37. MacArthur RH, Pianka ER. On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat. 1966;100:603–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Martin TE. Resource selection by tropical frugivorous birds: integrating multiple interactions. Oecologia. 1985;66:563–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Matuzak GD, Bezy MB, Brightsmith DJ. Foraging ecology of parrots in a modified landscape: seasonal trends and introduced species. Wilson J Ornithol. 2008;120:353–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Montes-Pérez RC, Mora Camacho O, Mukul Yerves JM. Forage intake of the Collared Peccary (Pecari tajacu). Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu. 2012;25:586–91.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Morales-Pérez L. Evaluación de la abundancia poblacional y recursos alimenticios para tres géneros de psitácidos en hábitats conservados y perturbados de la costa de Jalisco México. M.Sc Thesis. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2005.

  42. Muñoz-Lacy LG. Uso del hábitat y recursos alimenticios por la guacamaya verde (Ara militaris) en la costa de Jalisco y su potencial para el ecoturismo. M.Sc. Thesis, Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2014.

  43. Neu CW, Byers CR, Peek JM. A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. J Wildl Manage. 1974;38:541–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Okolie PN, Uaboi-Egbenni PO, Ajekwene AE. Extraction and quality evaluation of Sandbox Tree seed (Hura crepitan) Oil. World J Agric Sci. 2012;8:359–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Olah G, Butchart SHM, Symes A, Medina Guzman I, Cunningham R, Brightsmith DJ, et al. Ecological and socio-economic factors affecting extinction risk in parrots. Biodivers Conserv. 2016;25:205–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pennington TD, Sarukhán J. Árboles tropicales de México. Manual para la identificación de las principales especies. 3rd ed. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México y Fondo de Cultura Económica; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pitter E, Christiansen MB. Ecology, status and conservation of the Red-fronted Macaw Ara rubrogenys. Bird Conserv Int. 1995;5:61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Plata FX, Evergenny S, Resendiz JL, Villarreal O, Bárcena R, Viccon JA, et al. Palatabilidad y composición química de alimentos consumidos en cautiverio por el venado cola blanca de Yucatán (Odocoileus virginianus yucatanensis). Arch Med Vet. 2009;41:123–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Puebla-Olivares F, Salcedo-Hernandez JE, Figueroa-Esquivel EM. El habillo (Hura polyandra) en la dieta de la guacamaya verde (Ara militaris). Huitzil Rev Mex Ornitol. 2018;19:157–67.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL. Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Q Rev Biol. 1997;52:137–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ragusa-Netto J. Dry fruits and the abundance of the Blue-and-yellow Macaw (Ara ararauna) at a cerrado remnant in central Brazil. Ornitol Neotrop. 2006;17:491–500.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ragusa-Netto J, Fecchio A. Plant food resources and the diet of a parrot community in a gallery forest of the Southern Pantanal (Brazil). Braz J Biol. 2006;66:1021–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Renton K. Lilac-crowned parrot diet and food resource availability: resource tracking by a parrot seed predator. Condor. 2001;103:62–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Renton K. Diet of adult and nestling Scarlet Macaws in Southwest Belize, Central America. Biotropica. 2006;38:280–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Renton K, Salinas-Melgoza A, De Labra Hernández MA, de la Parra-Martínez SM. Resource requirements of parrots: nest-site selectivity and dietary plasticity of Psittaciformes. J Ornithol. 2015;156(Suppl. 1):73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Robinet O, Bretagnolle V, Clout M. Activity patterns, habitat use, foraging behavior and food selection of the Ouvea Parakeet (Eunymphicus cornutus uvaeensis). Emu. 2003;103:71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Rubio RY. Preferencia de hábitat de la guacamaya verde (Ara militaris Linné) en el municipio de Cosalá, Sinaloa. M.Sc. Thesis. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2015.

  58. Rzedowski J. Vegetación de México, digital edition. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Mexico City; 2006. http://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/publicaciones/librosDig/pdf/VegetacionMx_Cont.pdf.

  59. Sandoval GMP. Inventario avifaunístico de la presa Cajón de Peña, Jalisco, México. Guadalajara: Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Santos AA, Ragusa-Netto J. Plant food resources exploited by Blue-and-Yellow Macaws (Ara ararauna, Linnaeus 1758) at an urban area in Central Brazil. Braz J Biol. 2014;74:429–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Saunders DA. Problems of survival in an extensively cultivated landscape: the case of Carnaby’s Cockatoo Calyptorhynchus funereus latirostris. Biol Conserv. 1990;54:277–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Saunders DA. The effect of land clearing on the ecology of Carnaby’s Cockatoo and the inland Red-tailed Black Cockatoo in the wheatbelt of western Australia. Acta XX Congressus International Ornithologici; 1991. p 658–65.

  63. Saunders DA, Lngram JA. Factors affecting survival of breeding populations of Carnaby’s Cockatoo Calyptorhynchus funereus latirostris in remnants of native vegetation. In: Saunders DA, Arnold GW, Burbidge AA, Hopkins AJM, editors. Nature Conservation: the role of remnants of native vegetation. Australia: Surrey Beatty & Sons; 1987. p. 249–58.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Schoener TW. Theory of feeding strategies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 1971;2:369–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. SIEG. Diagnóstico del Municipio Cabo Corrientes. Sistema de Información Estadística y Geográfica de Jalisco. 2012. http://iieg.gob.mx/contenido/Municipios/cuadernillos/Cabocorrientes.pdf.

  66. Skoog DA, Holler FJ, Crouch SR. Principios de análisis instrumental. 6th ed. Illes Balears: Cengage Learning; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Stephens DW, Krebs JR. Foraging theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Valera F, Wagner RH, Romero-Pujante M, Gutiérrez JE, Rey PJ. Dietary specialization on high protein seeds by adult and nestling serins. Condor. 2005;107:29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Vaughan CN, Nemeth N, Marineros L. Scarlet Macaw, Ara macao, (Psittaciformes: Psittacidae) diet in central Pacific Costa Rica. R Biol Trop. 2006;54:919–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Nutritional analyses were conducted by the Laboratorio de Nutrición Animal of the Facultad de Medicina, Veterinaria y Zootecnia, UNAM, and we are grateful to Águeda García Pérez for assistance with bromotological analyses. We are grateful to the Cajon de Peñas local community for permission to work on their lands, and thank Bonnie Jauregui for logistical support.

Funding

The research was funded by UNAM-DGAPA-PAPIIT Grant IN205716, the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (MX) project 179877, and the Loro Parque Fundación A.C., all to KR. The Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (MX) provided study grants (Doctoral Grant 220278 to SMdP-M, Postdoctoral Grant 98294 to AS-M, and Masters student grant to LGM-L). SMdP-M also received a Graduation Bonus from the Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Centro Universitario de la Costa, Universidad de Guadalajara, Av. Universidad No. 203, Delegación Ixtapa, C.P. 48280, Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, Mexico

    Sylvia Margarita de la Parra-Martínez

  2. Comisión Nacional Para el Conocimiento y Uso para la Biodiversidad, Liga Periférico-Insurgentes Sur 4903, Delegación Tlalpan, 14010, Mexico City, Mexico

    Luis Guillermo Muñoz-Lacy

  3. Facultad de Biología, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Ciudad Universitaria, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico

    Alejandro Salinas-Melgoza

  4. Estación de Biología Chamela, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 21, San Patricio-Melaque, Jalisco, Mexico

    Katherine Renton

Authors
  1. Sylvia Margarita de la Parra-Martínez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luis Guillermo Muñoz-Lacy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alejandro Salinas-Melgoza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Katherine Renton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KR conceived and designed the study. SMdP-M, LGM-L, and AS-M conducted field work and collected data. SMdP-M, and KR analysed and interpreted the data. SMdP-M and KR wrote and revised the paper. KR contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, and obtained funding. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine Renton.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures and protocols comply with Mexican law, and the Dirección General de Vida Silvestre of the Secretaria del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales provided permits for the research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de la Parra-Martínez, S.M., Muñoz-Lacy, L.G., Salinas-Melgoza, A. et al. Optimal diet strategy of a large-bodied psittacine: food resource abundance and nutritional content enable facultative dietary specialization by the Military Macaw. Avian Res 10, 38 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-019-0177-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ara militaris
  • Bromatological analysis
  • Diet composition
  • Food resource selection
  • Fruiting phenology
  • Hura polyandra
  • Psittacidae
  • Tropical dry forest

Avian Research

ISSN: 2053-7166