Ballentine B, Hyman J, Nowicki S. Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. Behav Ecol. 2004;15:163–8.
Ballentine B. The ability to perform physically challenging songs predicts age and size in male swamp sparrows, Melospiza georgiana. Anim Behav. 2009;77:973–8.
Bertelli S, Tubaro PL. Body mass and habitat correlates of song structure in a primitive group of birds. Biol J Linn Soc. 2002;77:423–30.
Botero CA, Rossman RJ, Caro LM, Stenzler LM, Lovette IJ, De Kort SR, Vehrencamp SL. Syllable type consistency is related to age, social status and reproductive success in the tropical mockingbird. Anim Behav. 2009;77:701–6.
Brumm H. Song amplitude and body size in birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2009;63:1157–65.
Byers BE. Extra pair paternity in chestnut-sided warblers is correlated with consistent vocal performance. Behav Ecol. 2007;18:130–6.
Byers BE, Akresh ME, King DI. Song and male quality in prairie warblers. Ethology. 2016;122:660–70.
Candolin U, Voigt HR. Correlation between male size and territory quality: consequence of male competition or predation susceptibility? Oikos. 2001;95:225–30.
Cardoso GC, Mamede AT, Atwell JW, Mota PG, Ketterson ED, Price TD. Song frequency does not reflect differences in body size among males in two oscine species. Ethology. 2008;114:1084–93.
Cardoso GC. Paradoxical calls: the opposite signaling role of sound frequency across bird species. Behav Ecol. 2012;23:237–41.
Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
Davies NB, Halliday TR. Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo. Nature. 1978;274:683–5.
Draganoiu TI, Nagle L, Kreutzer M. Directional female preference for an exaggerated male trait in canary (Serinus canaria) song. Proc R Soc B. 2002;269:2525–31.
Forstmeier W, Kempenaers B, Meyer A, Leisler B. A novel song parameter correlates with extra-pair paternity and reflects male longevity. Proc R Soc B. 2002;269:1479–85.
Forstmeier W, Balsby T. Why mated dusky warblers sing so much: territory guarding and male quality announcement. Behaviour. 2002;139:89–111.
Forstmeier W. Individual reproductive strategies in the dusky warbler (Phylloscopus fuscatus): female and male perspectives. PhD Thesis. Germany: Max-Planck-Forschungsstelle für Ornithologie; 2002.
Galeotti P, Saino N, Sacchi R, Møller AP. Song correlates with social context, testosterone and body condition in male barn swallows. Anim Behav. 1997;53:678–700.
Gil D, Gahr M. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits [review]. Trends Ecol Evol. 2002;17:133–41.
Handford P, Lougheed SC. Variation in duration and frequency characters in the song of the rufous-collared sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis, with respect to habitat, trill dialects and body size. Condor. 1991;93:644–58.
Hall ML, Kingma SA, Peters A. Male songbird indicates body size with low-pitched advertising songs. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e56717.
Hardouin LA, Reby D, Bavoux C, Bruneleau G, Bretagnolle V. Communication of male quality in owl hoots. Am Nat. 2007;169:552–62.
Hughes M. Size assessment via a visual signal in snapping hrimp. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1996;38:51–7.
Irwin DE, Thimgan MP, Irwin JH. Call divergence is correlated with geographic and genetic distance in greenish warblers (Phylloscopus trochiloides): a strong role for stochasticity in signal evolution? J Evol Biol. 2008;21:435–48.
Ivanitskii VV, Marova IM, Malykh IM. Between order and chaos: contrasting syntax in the advertising song of dusky (Phylloscopus fuscatus) and Radde’s (Ph. schwarzi) warblers. J Ornithol. 2012;153:337–46.
Jonart LM, Hill GE, Badyaev AV. Fighting ability and motivation: determinants of dominance and contest strategies in females of a passerine bird. Anim Behav. 2007;74:1675–81.
Jones TM, Ward MP, Benson TJ, Brawn JD. Variation in nestling body condition and wing development predict cause-specific mortality in fledgling dickcissels. J Avian Biol. 2017;48:439–47.
Koivula K, Lahti K, Orell M, Rytkönen S. Prior residency as a key determinant of social dominance in the willow tit (Parus montanus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1993;33:283–7.
Kroodsma DE, Byers BE. The function(s) of bird song. Integr Comp Biol. 1991;31:318–28.
Labocha MK, Hayes JP. Morphometric indices of body condition in birds: a review. J Ornithol. 2012;153:1–22.
Linhart P, Slabbekoorn H, Fuchs R. The communicative significance of song frequency and song length in territorial chiffchaffs. Behav Ecol. 2012;23:1338–47.
Linhart P, Fuchs R. Song pitch indicates body size and correlates with males’ response to playback in a songbird. Anim Behav. 2015;103:91–8.
Liu JP. Song and body size of dusk warbler (Phylloscopus fuscatus) at Saihanba in Hebei. Master’s Thesis. Baoding, China: Hebei Agricultural University; 2016. (in Chinese)
Liu JP, Zhang ZQ, Gu DH, Ma LK, Hou JH. Song characteristics analysis of the dusky warbler (Phylloscopus fuscatus) at Saihanba in Hebei. Chin J Zool. 2016;51:207–13 (in Chinese).
Liu JP, Ma LK, Zhang ZQ, Gu DH, Wang JJ, Li JJ, Gao LJ, Hou JJ. Maximum frequency of songs reflects body size among male dusky warbler Phylloscopus fuscatus (Passeriformes: Phylloscopidae). Ital J Zool. 2017;84:186–92.
Lu SF, Liu J, Xia CW. Lack of body size and beak length constraints on the frequency of Emberiza godlewskii’s song. Chin J Zool. 2014;49:334–40 (in Chinese).
Martens J, Tietze DT, Eck S, Veith M. Radiation and species limits in the Asian Pallas’s warbler complex (Phylloscopus proregulus sl). J Ornithol. 2004;145:206–22.
Martin JP, Doucet SM, Knox RC, Mennill DJ. Body size correlates negatively with the frequency of distress calls and songs of neotropical birds. J Field Ornithol. 2011;82:259–68.
Miyashita A, Kizaki H, Sekimizu K, Kaito C. No effect of body size on the frequency of calling and courtship song in the two-spotted cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0146999.
Päckert M, Martens J, Eck S, Nazarenko AA, Valchuk OP, Petri B, Veith M. The great tit (Parus major)—a misclassified ring species. Biol J Linn Soc. 2005;86:153–74.
Patel R, Mulder RA, Cardoso GC. What makes vocalisation frequency an unreliable signal of body size in birds? A study on black swans. Ethology. 2010;116:554–63.
Potvin DA. Larger body size on islands affects silvereye Zosterops lateralis song and call frequency. J Avian Biol. 2013;44:221–5.
Price JJ, Christopher L. Use and characteristics of two singing modes in pine warblers. Wilson J Ornithol. 2013;125:552–61.
Robertson JGM. Male territoriality, fighting and assessment of fighting ability in the Australian frog Uperoleia rugosa. Anim Behav. 1986;34:763–72.
Searcy WA. Morphological correlates of dominance in captive male red winged blackbirds. Condor. 1979;81:417–20.
Searcy WA, Anderson RC, Nowicki S. Bird song as a signal of aggressive intent. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2006;60:234–41.
Sprau P, Roth T, Amrhein V, Naguib M. The predictive value of trill performance in a large repertoire songbird, the nightingale Luscinia megarhynchos. J Avian Biol. 2013;44:567–74.
Tubaro PL, Mahler B. Acoustic frequencies and body mass in New World doves. Condor. 1998;100:54–61.
Xiao H, Zhou ZX, Wang N, Zhang YY. Analyzing song characteristics of Yellow-bellied Tits (Parus venustulus). Zool Res. 2008;29:277–84 (in Chinese).
Wagner WE. Fighting, assessment, and frequency alteration in Blanchard’s cricket frog. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1989;25:429–36.
Wallschläger D. Correlation of song frequency and body weight in passerine birds. Experientia. 1980;36:412.
Zheng GM. Ornithology. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press; 2011.