Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Hawk mimicry does not reduce attacks of cuckoos by highly aggressive hosts

Avian Research20189:35

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-018-0127-4

  • Received: 31 May 2018
  • Accepted: 15 October 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Resemblance to raptors such as hawks (Accipiter spp.) is considered to be an adaptive strategy of cuckoos (Cuculus spp.), which has evolved to protect cuckoos against host attacks. However, the effectiveness of the mimicry remains controversial, and is not yet fully studied for highly aggressive hosts.

Methods

We evaluated the effectiveness of sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) mimicry by common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) in oriental reed warblers (Acrocephaus orientalis), which are highly aggressive hosts. Using a both the single and the paired dummy experiment, defense behaviors and attack intensities of oriental reed warblers against common cuckoos, sparrowhawks and oriental turtle doves (Streptopelia orientalis) were assessed.

Results

Oriental reed warblers exhibit strong nest defense behaviors, and such behaviors do not change with breeding stage (i.e., egg stage and nestling stage). Furthermore, assistance from conspecific helpers may increase attack intensities. However, they were deterred from mobbing overall by the presence of the hawk.

Conclusions

Oriental reed warblers are able to distinguish cuckoos from harmless doves. However, they may be deterred from mobbing by the presence of the predatory hawk, suggesting hawk mimicry may be ineffective and does not reduce attacks of cuckoos by highly aggressive hosts.

Keywords

  • Attack
  • Brood parasitism
  • Common cuckoo
  • Mobbing
  • Nest defense
  • Oriental reed warbler

Background

The confrontation between adaptation and counter-adaptation of specific avian brood parasites, such as cuckoos, and their hosts, is a classic example of co-evolution (Davies 2000, 2011; Soler 2014). The high costs of successful cuckoo parasitism have forced hosts to evolve counter-adaptive strategies in different stages. For instance, during the egg laying and incubation stage, many hosts have developed the ability to recognize foreign eggs (Davies and Brooke 1988, 1989; Brooke and Davies 1988; Stokke et al. 2002; Spottiswoode and Stevens 2010, 2011; Yang et al. 2016). During the nestling stage, hosts are able to identify foreign chicks (Langmore et al. 2003, 2009; Grim 2007; Sato et al. 2010; Yang et al. 2015; Huo et al. 2018). Usually, cuckoos take one host egg during parasitism (Chance 1940; Davies 2000), which means that, once cuckoo eggs are laid, hosts suffer various levels of reproductive losses, even if they perform successful defense behaviors afterwards. Therefore, preventing cuckoos from laying eggs, i.e. nest defense, is the most effective anti-parasitism strategy (Welbergen and Davies 2009; Feeney et al. 2012).

The competition between hosts and brood parasites during the egg laying and incubation stage has received much attention. Many hosts demonstrate strong aggressive nest protection behaviors against cuckoos approaching the nests, to prevent parasitism (Welbergen and Davies 2009). This leads to huge costs for the cuckoos (Davies and Brooke 1988; Welbergen and Davies 2008), and may even result in the death of the cuckoos (Molnár 1944). In addition, hosts’ nest defenses against cuckoos not only prevent cuckoo parasitism (Welbergen and Davies 2009), but such defense behaviors can be passed on to other individuals through learning, hence strengthening anti-parasitism of the population (Davies and Welbergen 2009; Thorogood and Davies 2012, 2016; Feeney and Langmore 2013).

Successful nest defense forces cuckoos to develop more effective parasitism strategies, and mimicking hawks (Accipiter spp.) is thought to be an adaption of cuckoos against host attacks (Langmore and Kilner 2010; Welbergen and Davies 2011; Feeney et al. 2012; Thorogood and Davies 2013a, b). Hawks are typical small birds of prey, and pose more direct threats to adult birds (Götmark and Post 1996). Resemblance to hawks enables cuckoos to confuse and alarm hosts, and reduce attacks from hosts (Davies and Welbergen 2008; Welbergen and Davies 2011). A recent study discovered that calls of female common cuckoos mimic those of sparrowhawks to some extent, which resulted in similar intimidation (York and Davies 2017). However, the effectiveness of cuckoos’ hawk mimicry has only been demonstrated for a few host species, among which only reed warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) are main hosts of common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) (Davies and Welbergen 2008; Langmore and Kilner 2010; Welbergen and Davies 2011; Thorogood and Davies 2013b; Liang 2017; York and Davies 2017). Reed warblers lack aggressiveness, and are not strong nest defenders, although nest defense levels in reed warblers vary significantly between different species (Montgomerie and Weatherhead 1988). Therefore, results from studies on reed warblers cannot be extrapolated to other hosts. In fact, many hosts can accurately identify the differences between cuckoos and sparrowhawks, and respond with different defense levels (Duckworth 1991; Grim 2005; Welbergen and Davies 2008; Campobello and Sealy 2010; Feeney et al. 2012; Trnka and Prokop 2012; Li et al. 2015; Liang and Møller 2015; Yu et al. 2016, 2017). For example, Smith and Hosking (1955) discovered that many small passerines (not the main hosts of cuckoos) fear sparrowhawk dummies, but attack cuckoo dummies aggressively, suggesting their abilities to distinguish the two. Paired experiments with great reed warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) by Trnka and Prokop (2012) revealed that, when presented simultaneously with paired dummies (of common cuckoo, sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus, and turtle dove Streptopelia turtur), great reed warblers exhibit aggressive attack behaviors to both dummies, with higher attack intensities towards cuckoos and sparrowhawks. However, a study by Feeney et al. (2015) suggested that tawny-flanked prinia (Prinia subflava) hosts were equally aggressive towards female cuckoo finches (Anomalospiza imberbis) and southern red bishops (Euplectes orix), suggesting successful mimicry of female bishops by female cuckoo finches.

The oriental reed warbler (Acrocephaus orientalis) is one of the main hosts of common cuckoos, and the two have reached a relatively high “arms race level” after long-term coevolution (Yang et al. 2014, 2016, 2017; Li et al. 2016). Oriental reed warblers are highly aggressive towards intruders, and can adjust their attack intensities according to the level of threat and familiarity of the intruders (Li et al. 2015, 2016) or under variable parasitism pressures (Lindholm and Thomas 2000). In great reed warblers, they attacked cuckoos and sparrowhawks more often than turtle doves. However, when confronted with the simultaneously presented mounts, they attacked the cuckoo more frequently than the sparrowhawk (Trnka and Prokop 2012). In addition, Trnka and Prokop (2012) found that attack behaviors of great reed warblers towards common cuckoos weaken with nest stage (but see Moskát 2005).

In this study, we tested a different population of oriental reed warblers during the egg laying, early incubation and nestling stages of nest cycle. Oriental reed warblers were presented with three different types of single dummies, namely common cuckoos, sparrowhawks and oriental turtle doves (Streptopelia orientalis), as well as paired dummies prepared by combining different dummies. By conducting these experiments, we aimed to evaluate the ability of oriental reed warblers to correctly identify potential brood parasites, and to assess nest defense behaviors towards different nest intruders.

Methods

Study area and study species

The study area is located in the Yongnianwa wetland in Yongnian County, Hebei Province, China (36°40′60″‒36°41′06″N, 114°41′15″–114°45′00″E). The Yongnianwa wetland is a natural depression in the alluvial plain of the Fuyang River, a tributary of the Hai River. It is located at the intersection of the Fuyang River and the Zhang River. The area is in a temperate semi-humid continental monsoon climate zone and includes mature hydrological systems with many river branches. The wetland is located at only 40.3 m above sea level, and is filled with water all year round. The average annual rainfall is 527.8 mm which concentrated in the summer and the annual average temperature is 12.9 °C. The main plant species in the wetland are reed (Phragmites australis) mixed with cattail (Typha latifolia), and other herbaceous plants (Ma et al. 2018). A total of 257 oriental reed warbler nests with an overall parasitism rate of 14.8% were recorded during the breeding seasons 2016‒2017 (Ma et al. 2018).

Field data collection

Field work was carried out during the bird breeding seasons (April–August) of 2016 and 2017. Breeding nests of oriental reed warblers were systematically searched within the study area, and the breeding stage of each nest was determined. Oriental reed warbler nest defense behaviors were investigated using dummies (stuffed birds) of common cuckoos (27.7 cm in body length), sparrowhawks (33.2 cm in body length), and oriental turtle doves (25.8 cm in body length). Common cuckoos are common brood parasites in the study area. Sparrowhawks are typical predators of passerine birds and are common summer breeding hawks in northern China (Zheng 2017). Oriental turtle doves are commonly seen breeding birds in the study area. Two dummies were taken from each bird species and one of them was randomly selected in the experiments in order to avoid pseudo-replication. Hosts’ responses to the dummies included the following scale, from low to high levels of aggressiveness: (1) no response, the bird was not observed or watched the mount silently without clear responsive behavior; (2) alert, the bird approached the nest (hopped onto the reed stems), but gave alert calls from a safe distance (more than 1 m); (3) mobbing, the bird jumped or flew around/over the dummy, persistently giving alarm and distress calls; and (4) attack, the birds physically attacked the dummy. The first two responses are collectively considered to be non-attack behaviors, and the latter two are collectively considered to be attack behaviors (also see Li et al. 2015). The responsive behavior of the bird was recorded by L.M. hidden approximately 4‒5 m away from the nest site and other variables like number of attacks were extracted from subsequent analyses of video recordings in the laboratory. The mini-camera (size: 57 mm × 20 mm × 18 mm) was fixed at a distance of approximately 2 m in front of the nest and dummy.

Single dummy experiment

All single dummy experiments were completed during the 2016 breeding season. One dummy was randomly selected before an experiment. It was fixed at a distance of 0.5 m in front of an oriental reed warbler nest with a stand, and was kept standing with its head facing the nest. The 5-min responses of oriental reed warblers to the dummy were observed and recorded when the bird appeared around the dummy (also see Li et al. 2015). Subsequently, the next experiment was carried out at least 1 h later to minimize the effects of carry-over aggression (Gill et al. 2008). Each nest was presented with three mounts in random order and the sequence was completed within 1‒2 days.

Paired dummy experiment

The three types of dummies were combined in pairs as follows: common cuckoo versus turtle dove (Experiment 1), common cuckoo versus sparrowhawk (Experiment 2) and sparrowhawk versus turtle dove (Experiment 3). One pair of dummies was randomly selected before an experiment, and one direction of an oriental reed warbler nest was randomly chosen. The two dummies, placed 0.8 m away from each other, were fixed at a distance of 0.5 m in front of the nest with two stands, and were kept standing with their heads facing the nest (also see Trnka et al. 2012). The responses of oriental reed warblers to the dummies were observed. Each experiment began at the moment of the first contact-attack of one bird and lasted 1 min when the mounts were immediately removed to prevent them from being damaged. The attack intensity towards each of the two dummies was expressed in relation to the absolute number of attacks within 1 min since the first attack which was extracted from subsequent analyses of video recordings in the laboratory. Only one experiment was performed for each nest either in egg stage or nestling stage.

Data analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0. For the single dummy experiment, generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) were used to analyze the effect of dummy types and nest stage on defense behaviors of oriental reed warblers. For the paired dummy experiment, GLMMs were used to analyze the effects of nest stage on the defense levels of oriental reed warblers. Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used to investigate variations in defense levels in response to different dummies in each paired experiment. The significance level was set at p = 0.05, and variables were considered to be highly significant when p < 0.01.

Results

Single dummy experiments

In total, 39 dummy experiments were performed (Fig. 1), including two sets of single dummy experiments for four nests which one nest of egg stage was lack of hawk dummy experiment and three nests of nestling stage were lack of two hawk dummy experiments and one cuckoo dummy experiment, and three sets of single dummy experiments for the remaining nests. Thus, single dummy experiments were performed for 31 nests of oriental reed warblers, with 13 nests in the egg incubation stage, and 18 nests in the nestling stage.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Aggressive responses of oriental reed warblers to different types of dummies in the single dummy experiment

All oriental reed warblers performed for single dummy experiments showed strong nest defense behaviors, and 90% (28/31) of the oriental reed warblers attacked the dummies. Attacks were observed in 73% of all experiments (65/89), and 69% of the attacks involved neighbor participation (45/65), with the number of helpers ranging from 1 to 11. Nest defense behaviors were not affected by dummy type nor nest stage (dummy type: F = 2.351, p = 0.102; nest stage: F = 0.000, p = 1.000).

Paired dummy experiments

In total, 63 nests of oriental reed warblers were tested for paired dummy experiments either in egg stage or in nestling stage. The experiment 1 was performed for 7 nests in the egg stage and 12 nests in the nestling stage. The experiment 2 was performed for 11 nests in the egg stage and 11 nests in the nestling stage. The experiment 3 was performed for 10 nests in the egg stage and 11 nests in the nestling stage.

Attack intensities of oriental reed warblers towards paired dummies did not vary with nest stage (cuckoo vs. dove: F = 0.069, p = 0.794; cuckoo vs. hawk: F = 0.061, p = 0.807; hawk vs. dove: F = 0.118, p = 0.735). Therefore, all data from the egg incubation and nestling stages were combined for analysis. There was a significant difference in the number of attacks directed to each dummy in the dummy combination of common cuckoo versus turtle dove, and the number of attacks directed at common cuckoos was significantly higher than that to turtle doves (Wilcoxon signed ranks test, Z = − 3.529, p < 0.001). However, we found no significant attack preferences for the other dummy pairs (Fig. 2; cuckoo vs. hawk: Z = − 1.038, p = 0.299; hawk vs. dove: Z = − 0.035, p = 0.972).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Intensity of aggressive responses of oriental reed warblers to different types of dummies in the paired dummy experiment

Discussion

The main findings of this study were that oriental reed warblers displayed aggressive nest defense behaviors with more than 90% of the warblers demonstrating strong attack behaviors towards intruders, and their nest defense behaviors did not differ between egg laying, incubation, and nestling stages. Our results were similar to previous work on reed warblers, which found few differences in overall attacks at different stages (Li et al. 2015), although rasp call rate towards cuckoos declined significantly between egg laying and chick rearing stages (Campobello and Sealy 2010). In addition, long time interval among different dummy experiments would minimize the effects of carry-over aggression.

However, the results on the attack intensities of oriental reed warblers towards different types of attackers are not in agreement with the results found in another population of oriental reed warblers (Li et al. 2015) and great reed warblers (Trnka et al. 2012). In our study, oriental reed warblers were able to distinguish common cuckoos from harmless turtle doves, and tended to be more likely to mob cuckoos than sparrowhawks, although this tendency was not significant perhaps due to the low sample size for each presentation. These results imply that oriental reed warblers are highly aggressive towards any model placed at their nests regardless of mimicry.

Many hosts are known to violently expel and attack cuckoos near their nests, causing different levels of damage to cuckoos (Wyllie 1981; Davies and Brooke 1988; Welbergen and Davies 2008), and even death (Molnár 1944). This reduces the chances of successful cuckoo parasitism (Welbergen and Davies 2009; Feeney et al. 2012; Thorogood and Davies 2016). The strong attacks of oriental reed warblers towards cuckoo dummies in our study resemble those of other hosts. Meanwhile, in paired experiments, when facing familiar intruders, namely common cuckoos and turtle doves, simultaneously, oriental reed warblers demonstrated significant selective aggression towards common cuckoos, indicating their abilities to distinguish the two intruders. This is in accordance with previous research on oriental reed warblers (Li et al. 2015).

However, in both single and paired dummy experiments, the responses of oriental reed warblers to sparrowhawks were not significantly different from their responses to common cuckoos (Z = − 1.038, p = 0.299) and doves (Z = − 0.035, p = 0.972). In particular, in the paired dummy experiments, cuckoos were attacked much less often when they were presented alongside a hawk than a dove. This was different from the behaviors displayed by oriental reed warblers in the population studied by Li et al. (2015), as well as the great reed warbler populations of European lineage (Moskát 2005; Trnka and Prokop 2012; Trnka et al. 2012), suggesting that oriental reed warblers in our population may be deterred from mobbing overall by the presence of the predatory hawk. Interestingly, Li et al. (2015) also found that the magpie (Pica pica), a commonly seen but larger nest/egg predator, were attacked much less often by oriental reed warblers.

In reed warblers, hosts’ mobbing rates varied depending on cuckoo parasitism risk (Thorogood and Davies 2013a), and also by the risk of encountering a hawk if mistaking it for a cuckoo (Thorogood and Davies 2012, 2013b). In our study population of oriental reed warblers, the cuckoo parasitism rate was 14.8% (Ma et al. 2018), which was lower than that of other populations in China (27.3%; Yang et al. 2014), great reed warblers (64%; Moskát and Honza 2002) and reed warblers (31%; Trnka and Prokop 2011) in Europe. Such low parasitism might explain why oriental reed warblers displayed aggressive nest defense behaviors towards cuckoos suggesting that hawk mimicry may be ineffective in our population of oriental reed warblers.

Another possibility was that oriental reed warblers are aggressive in general, and tend to expel any intruders. Our results indicated that even for familiar yet harmless doves, oriental reed warblers exhibited an attack rate as high as 58% (18/31), and even attacked people who approached their nests (L.M., personal observations). Among all attack behaviors, helper-assisted attacks occur in up to 69% of the nests studied. We suggest that the presence of helpers may reinforce the oriental reed warblers’ desires to attack, and make them much bolder when facing intruders. In a study on European pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca), the existence of helpers was found to enhance European pied flycatchers’ aggression and their desire to attack predators, and birds may sense the presence of helpers when attacking intruders (Krams et al. 2009, 2012). In our study, the presence of helpers within the population is much higher than in the population in other studies (Li et al. 2015, 2016), which may be due to different population densities and parasitism rates in different areas. Nonetheless, further studies are needed to investigate whether this may lead to variations in nest defense behaviors.

In a European study on great reed warblers, it was discovered that their attack behaviors towards common cuckoos weaken with nest stage (Trnka and Prokop 2012). This is because, although common cuckoos may visit host nests at any stage, most eggs are laid during the egg laying stage, and parasitism pressure is reduced during the nestling stage (Honza et al. 2002). Other studies, however, suggested that great reed warblers’ nest defense did not weaken with the advancement of nest stage, and that the attack intensities remained relatively high during the nestling stage (Moskát 2005). In our study, no changes in nest defense levels with the nest stages were found for oriental reed warblers, which agreed with previous work (Campobello and Sealy 2010; Li et al. 2015). Relative to the less aggressive hosts, the high aggressiveness of oriental reed warblers may be a broad nest defense behavior and thus does not vary with nest stage and intruder types. Another opinion is that cuckoos are not only nest parasites, but also nest predators, which has been reported for a number of host species (Davies and Brooke 1988; Moksnes et al. 2000; Briskie 2007; Su et al. 2017).

Conclusions

In this study, we showed that oriental reed warblers not only exhibit strong nest defense behaviors, but that they also employ a variety of defenses intended to expel and attack any intruders within their nest-sites. Furthermore, assistance from conspecific helpers may increase oriental reed warblers’ attack intensities. In addition, nest defense behaviors in oriental reed warblers did not change with breeding stage (i.e., egg stage, nestling stage). Our study indicated that oriental reed warblers are able to distinguish cuckoos from harmless doves. However, they may be deterred from mobbing by the presence of the predatory hawk, suggesting hawk mimicry may be ineffective and does not reduce attacks of cuckoos by highly aggressive hosts.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

WL conceived and designed the experiments. LM conducted the field work. CY and LM performed the data analysis. LM wrote the early draft and WL revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Rose Thorogood and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an early version of this manuscript. We thank the Forestry Bureau of Yongnian County, Hebei Province, China, for permission to undertake this study including all experimental procedures. We are grateful to Jianping Liu, Jianwei Zhang, Bo Zhou and Xiaodong Rao for their assistance with fieldwork.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethical standard

The experiments comply with the current laws of China. Experimental procedures were in agreement with the Animal Research Ethics Committee of Hainan Provincial Education Centre for Ecology and Environment, Hainan Normal University (Permit No. HNECEE-2012-003).

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31672303 to CY, 31472013 and 31772453 to WL).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, 571158, China

References

  1. Briskie JV. Direct observations of shining cuckoos (Chrysococcyx lucidus) parasitising and depredating grey warbler (Gerygone igata) nests. Notornis. 2007;54:15–9.Google Scholar
  2. Brooke MdL, Davies NB. Egg mimicry by cuckoos Cuculus canorus in relation to discrimination by hosts. Nature. 1988;335:630–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Campobello D, Sealy SG. Enemy recognition of reed warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus): threats and reproductive value act independently in nest defence modulation. Ethology. 2010;116:498–508.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chance EP. The truth about the cuckoo. London: Country Life; 1940.Google Scholar
  5. Davies NB. Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. London: T & AD Poyser; 2000.Google Scholar
  6. Davies NB. Cuckoo adaptations: trickery and tuning. J Zool. 2011;284:1–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies NB, Brooke MdL. Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim Behav. 1988;36:262–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies NB, Brooke MdL. An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts I: host egg discrimination. J Anim Ecol. 1989;58:207–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies NB, Welbergen JA. Cuckoo–hawk mimicry? An experimental test. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2008;275:1817–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Davies NB, Welbergen JA. Social transmission of a host defense against cuckoo parasitism. Science. 2009;324:1318–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Duckworth JW. Responses of breeding reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus to mounts of sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus, cuckoo Cuculus canorus and jay Garrulus glandarius. IBIS. 1991;133:68–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Feeney WE, Langmore NE. Social learning of a brood parasite by its host. Biol Lett. 2013;9:20130443.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Feeney WE, Welbergen JA, Langmore NE. The frontline of avian brood parasite–host coevolution. Anim Behav. 2012;84:3–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Feeney WE, Troscianko J, Langmore NE, Spottiswoode CN. Evidence for aggressive mimicry in an adult brood parasitic bird, and generalized defences in its host. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2015;282:20150795.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Gill SA, Neudorf DLH, Sealy SG. Do hosts discriminate between sexually dichromatic male and female brown-headed cowbirds? Ethology. 2008;114:548–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Götmark F, Post P. Prey selection by sparrowhawks, Accipiter nisus: relative predation risk for breeding passerine birds in relation to their size, ecology and behaviour. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 1996;351:1559–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Grim T. Host recognition of brood parasites: implications for methodology in studies of enemy recognition. Auk. 2005;122:530–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Grim T. Experimental evidence for chick discrimination without recognition in a brood parasite host. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2007;2007(274):373–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Honza M, Taborsky B, Taborsky M, Teuschl Y, Vogl W, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. Behaviour of female common cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, in the vicinity of host nests before and during egg laying: a radio telemetry study. Anim Behav. 2002;64:861–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Huo J, Yang C, Su T, Liang W, Møller AP. Russet sparrows spot alien chicks from their nests. Avian Res. 2018;9:12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Krams I, Bērziņš A, Krama T. Group effect in nest defence behaviour of breeding pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav. 2009;77:513–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Krama T, Bērziņš A, Rytkönen S, Rantala MJ, Wheatcroft D, Krams I. Linking anti-predator behaviour and habitat quality: group effect in nest defence of a passerine bird. Acta Ethol. 2012;15:127–34View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Langmore NE, Kilner RM. The coevolutionary arms race between horsfield’s bronze-cuckoos and superb fairy-wrens. Emu. 2010;110:32–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Langmore NE, Hunt S, Kilner RM. Escalation of a coevolutionary arms race through host rejection of brood parasitic young. Nature. 2003;422:157–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Langmore NE, Cockburn A, Russell AF, Kilner RM. Flexible cuckoo chick-rejection rules in the superb fairy-wren. Behav Ecol. 2009;20:978–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Li D, Wei H, Zhang Z, Liang W, Stokke BG. Oriental reed warbler (Acrocephalus orientalis) nest defence behaviour towards brood parasites and nest predators. Behaviour. 2015;152:1601–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Li D, Zhang Z, Grim T, Liang W, Stokke BG. Explaining variation in brood parasitism rates between potential host species with similar habitat requirements. Evol Ecol. 2016;30:905–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Liang W. Crafty cuckoo calls. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:1427–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Liang W, Møller AP. Hawk mimicry in cuckoos and anti-parasitic aggressive behavior of barn swallows in Denmark and China. J Avian Biol. 2015;46:216–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindholm AK, Thomas RJ. Differences between populations of reed warblers in defences against brood parasitism. Behaviour. 2000;137:25–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Ma L, Yang C, Liu J, Zhang J, Liang W, Møller AP. Costs of breeding far away from neighbors: isolated host nests are more vulnerable to cuckoo parasitism. Behav Proc. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.07.017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Hagen LG, Honza M, Mørk C, Olsen PH. Common cuckoo Cuculus canorus and host behaviour at reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus nests. IBIS. 2000;142:247–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Molnár B. The cuckoo in the Hungarian plain. Aquila. 1944;51:100–12.Google Scholar
  34. Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ. Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Q Rev Biol. 1988;63:167–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Moskát C. Common cuckoo parasitism in Europe: behavioural adaptations, arms race and the role of metapopulations. Ornithol Sci. 2005;4:3–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Moskát C, Honza M. European cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism and host’s rejection behaviour in a heavily parasitized great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus population. IBIS. 2002;144:614–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith S, Hosking E. Birds fighting: experimental studies of the aggressive displays of some birds. London: Faber and Faber; 1955.Google Scholar
  38. Sato NJ, Tokue K, Noske RA, Mikami OK, Ueda K. Evicting cuckoo nestlings from the nest: a new anti-parasitism behaviour. Biol Lett. 2010;6:67–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Soler M. Long-term coevolution between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Biol Rev. 2014;89:688–704.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Spottiswoode CN, Stevens M. Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:8672–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Spottiswoode CN, Stevens M. How to evade a coevolving brood parasite: egg discrimination versus egg variability as host defences. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2011;278:3566–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. Obligate brood parasites as selective agents for evolution of egg appearance in passerine birds. Evolution. 2002;56:199–205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Su T, Shao L, Huo J, Yang C, Liang W. Himalayan cuckoo fed on eggs of Bianchi’s warbler. Chin J Ecol. 2017;36:89–93 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  44. Thorogood R, Davies NB. Cuckoos combat socially transmitted defenses of reed warbler hosts with a plumage polymorphism. Science. 2012;337:578–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Thorogood R, Davies NB. Reed warbler hosts fine-tune their defenses to track three decades of cuckoo decline. Evolution. 2013a;67:3545–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Thorogood R, Davies NB. Hawk mimicry and the evolution of polymorphic cuckoos. Chin Birds. 2013b;4:39–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Thorogood R, Davies NB. Combining personal with social information facilitates host defences and explains why cuckoos should be secretive. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19872.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Trnka A, Prokop P. Polygynous great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus suffer more cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism than monogamous pairs. J Avian Biol. 2011;42:192–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Trnka A, Prokop P. The effectiveness of hawk mimicry in protecting cuckoos from aggressive hosts. Anim Behav. 2012;83:263–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Trnka A, Prokop P, Grim T. Uncovering dangerous cheats: how do avian hosts recognize adult brood parasites? PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37445.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Welbergen JA, Davies NB. Reed warblers discriminate cuckoos from sparrowhawks with graded alarm signals that attract mates and neighbours. Anim Behav. 2008;76:811–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Welbergen JA, Davies NB. Strategic variation in mobbing as a front line of defense against brood parasitism. Curr Biol. 2009;19:235–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Welbergen JA, Davies NB. A parasite in wolf’s clothing: hawk mimicry reduces mobbing of cuckoos by hosts. Behav Ecol. 2011;22:574–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Wyllie I. The cuckoo. London: Batsford; 1981Google Scholar
  55. Yang C, Li D, Wang L, Liang G, Zhang Z, Liang W. Geographic variation in parasitism rates of two sympatric cuckoo hosts in China. Zool Res. 2014;35:67–71.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Yang C, Wang L, Chen M, Liang W, Møller AP. Nestling recognition in red-rumped and barn swallows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015;69:1–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Yang C, Wang L, Liang W, Møller AP. Egg recognition as antiparasitism defence in hosts does not select for laying of matching eggs in parasitic cuckoos. Anim Behav. 2016;122:177–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Yang C, Wang L, Liang W, Møller AP. How cuckoos find and choose host nests for parasitism. Behav Ecol. 2017;28:859–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. York JE, Davies NB. Female cuckoo calls misdirect host defences towards the wrong enemy. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:1520–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Yu J, Wang L, Xing X, Yang C, Ma J, Møller AP, Wang H, Liang W. Barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) differentiate between common cuckoo and sparrowhawk in China: alarm calls convey information on threat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2016;70:171–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Yu J, Xing X, Jiang Y, Liang W, Wang H, Møller AP. Alarm call-based discrimination between common cuckoo and Eurasian sparrowhawk in a Chinese population of great tits. Ethology. 2017;123:542–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Zheng G. A checklist on the classification and distribution of the birds of China. 3rd ed. Beijing: Science Press; 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement