Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of different model parameters during the next 50 years and sensitivity analysis

From: Can we reestablish a self-sustaining population? A case study on reintroduced Crested Ibis with population viability analysis

Description

Growth rate (r ± SD)

Extinction probability (%)

Final population size

Sensitivity index (Sx)

Present conditions

0.084 ± 0.071

0

367

–

K = 840

0.083 ± 0.069

0

724

0.9728

K = 210

0.081 ± 0.080

0

178

1.0300

Females:males = 1:2

0.085 ± 0.091

0

353

− 0.1142

Females:males = 2:1

0.024 ± 0.071

0

286

0.6608

Females:males = 1:3

0.034 ± 0.092

0

286

− 0.4414

Females:males = 3:1

− 0.017 ± 0.085

1

82

1.5531

Females:males = 1:4

− 0.012 ± 0.098

6

114

− 1.1490

Females:males = 4:1

− 0.037 ± 0.098

13

28

1.5395

10% higher frequency of catastrophes

0.080 ± 0.073

0

358

− 0.2452

10% lower frequency of catastrophes

0.087 ± 0.070

0

362

0.1362

50% higher frequency of catastrophes

0.066 ± 0.081

0

350

− 0.0926

50% lower frequency of catastrophes

0.100 ± 0.061

0

371

− 0.0218

10% higher adult mortality

0.081 ± 0.073

0

362

− 0.1362

10% lower adult mortality

0.088 ± 0.071

0

363

0.1090

10% higher subadult mortality

0.081 ± 0.072

0

362

− 0.1362

10% lower subadult mortality

0.086 ± 0.071

0

361

0.1635

10% higher fledgling mortality

0.069 ± 0.073

0

352

− 0.4087

10% lower fledgling mortality

0.096 ± 0.072

0

370

− 0.0817