Skip to main content

Table 5 Results of two analyses of covariance to test the effect of tree species (tree) and nest part (i.e. cup lining or outer nest), with latitude and longitude as covariates, on the mass of leaf from the four commonest tree species, and bark from four commonest plant species found in nests (see Fig. 5)

From: Geographical location affects size and materials used in the construction of European Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) nests

Source

Leaf (R2 = 49.1%)

Bark (R2 = 10.2%)

df

F value (p value)

df

F value (p value)

Latitude

12,575

3.13 (0.077)

1,2575

3.68 (0.055)

Longitude

12,575

9.59 (0.862)

1,2575

2.67 (0.103)

Tree

12,575

23.91 (< 0.001)

3,2575

7.04 (< 0.001)

Nest part

32,575

1.19 (0.275)

1,2575

5.08 (0.024)

Latitude × longitude

12,575

3.04 (0.081)

1,2575

2.53 (0.112)

Latitude × tree

32,575

22.45 (< 0.001)

3,2575

6.97 (< 0.001)

Latitude × nest part

12,575

1.31 (0.252)

1,257

5.00 (0.025)

Longitude × tree

32,575

21.88 (< 0.001)

3,2575

5.24 (0.001)

Longitude × nest part

12,575

1.85 (0.174)

1,2575

4.53 (0.033)

Nest part × tree

32,575

73.59 (< 0.001)

3,2575

2.26 (0.079)

Latitude × longitude × tree

32,575

21.40 (< 0.001)

3,2575

5.22 (0.001)

Latitude × longitude × nest part

32,575

1.85 (0.174)

1,2575

4.51 (0.034)

  1. The model included box area (cm2) as a covariate to control for variation in box size between locations. Bark masses were Log10-transformed prior to analysis. Model reflects sequential model reduction by removal of non-significant higher order interactions