Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of model selection relating bird species richness to predictor variables using corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc)

From: The influence of urban park characteristics on bird diversity in Nanjing, China

Model

K

AICc

ΔAICc

wi

Adjusted R2

Area + Distance + HD + Isolation1

6

− 78.60

0

0.3720

0.8190

Area + Noise + Distance + HD + Isolation1

7

− 77.48

1.12

0.2125

0.8227

Area + SI + Distance + HD + Isolation1

7

− 75.87

2.73

0.0950

0.8148

Area + Distance + HD + Isolation2 + Isolation1

7

− 75.54

3.06

0.0805

0.8131

Area + Noise + SI + Distance + HD + Isolation1

8

− 74.54

4.06

0.0489

0.8185

Area + Noise + Distance + HD + Isolation2 + Isolation1

8

− 74.22

4.38

0.0416

0.8169

Area + Noise + Distance + HD

6

− 74.15

4.45

0.0402

0.7959

Area + Distance + HD

5

− 73.83

4.77

0.0343

0.7842

Area + SI + Distance + HD + Isolation2 + Isolation1

8

− 72.59

6.01

0.0184

0.8087

Area + Noise + SI + Distance + HD

7

− 71.46

7.14

0.0105

0.7914

Area + SI + Distance + HD

6

− 71.32

7.28

0.0098

0.7796

Area + Noise + Distance + HD + Isolation2

7

− 71.13

7.47

0.0089

0.7895

Area + Noise + SI + Distance + HD + Isolation2 + Isolation1

9

− 71.03

7.57

0.0084

0.8122

Area + Distance + HD + Isolation2

6

− 70.97

7.63

0.0082

0.7775

  1. Models with ΔAICc < 10, number of estimable parameters (K), Akaike difference (ΔAICc), Akaike weight (wi) and adjusted R2 were listed. SI = Shape Index; HD = Habitat Diversity. All candidate models were listed in Additional file 1: Table S3. See Table 1 for the abbreviated variables