The influence of urban park characteristics on bird diversity in Nanjing, China

Yang, Xueru; Tan, Xinwei; Chen, Chuanwu; Wang, Yanping

doi:10.1186/s40657-020-00234-5

Avian Research

Table 1 Characteristics of the 37 study parks in Nanjing, China

From: The influence of urban park characteristics on bird diversity in Nanjing, China

Park code	Park area (ha)	Distance (m)	Isolation1 (m)	Isolation2 (m)	Number of habitats (n)	Noise (dB) (mean ± SD)	Shape index	S_obs (n)	S_exp (n)	S_com
1	514.68	2763.34	14307.45	14307.45	11	56.3 ± 6.7	1.15	41	44	0.93
2	160.49	4510.33	2324.98	19078.69	11	57.6 ± 1.7	1.42	44	49	0.90
3	100.64	3993.52	1122.29	17869.11	11	56.1 ± 3.1	1.17	36	45	0.80
4	98.54	5167.56	7922.71	17352.86	4	59.0 ± 4.3	1.82	20	21	0.95
5	63.66	7572.81	346.25	21753.38	8	60.8 ± 3.5	1.17	32	35	0.91
6	62.39	10637.12	3977.97	22046.94	12	56.6 ± 4.4	1.52	45	60	0.75
7	61.38	6776.72	8215.56	9966.08	10	53.9 ± 2.0	1.60	38	42	0.90
8	52.51	5474.82	522.35	14387.74	7	58.5 ± 6.0	1.78	21	36	0.58
9	45.33	20869.16	3229.51	32597.62	7	56.1 ± 3.5	1.13	34	46	0.74
10	33.55	12558.95	2252.73	21774.77	6	56.6 ± 1.5	1.13	26	26	1.00
11	33.33	3420.71	69.42	16962.47	9	59.5 ± 1.7	1.06	32	39	0.82
12	29.85	8047.15	335.05	22393.22	5	55.8 ± 4.6	1.24	28	30	0.93
13	29.60	3919.39	665.75	18868.94	6	58.6 ± 7.1	1.95	27	31	0.87
14	29.25	5488.70	1784.88	20425.40	10	59.4 ± 1.2	1.56	46	53	0.87
15	21.04	3993.33	2946.17	10856.04	11	57.0 ± 5.2	1.13	29	35	0.83
16	18.67	5272.27	1409.22	9343.43	5	52.1 ± 3.8	1.06	23	28	0.82
17	18.33	2273.25	1545.59	12079.61	4	58.2 ± 1.8	1.20	17	17	1.00
18	17.78	4164.21	19.50	18536.24	5	58.3 ± 4.4	1.07	25	27	0.93
19	16.94	2805.10	74.49	11619.00	4	57.7 ± 1.5	1.37	25	27	0.93
20	16.58	3696.73	285.73	17773.20	6	55.0 ± 4.3	1.37	29	33	0.88
21	15.93	2276.21	2730.40	16778.58	5	56.5 ± 6.0	1.08	19	25	0.76
22	14.82	12331.95	1668.50	24553.20	8	60.1 ± 3.1	1.38	27	32	0.84
23	12.95	2943.27	43.45	15664.05	7	56.2 ± 5.3	1.76	27	33	0.82
24	11.95	2155.60	304.18	14586.09	4	56.4 ± 6.1	1.22	23	26	0.88
25	9.56	6431.38	2105.76	9871.16	5	53.1 ± 1.7	1.36	16	22	0.73
26	9.35	10449.00	2359.27	25113.73	6	60.7 ± 3.0	1.62	23	26	0.88
27	9.30	1032.89	1398.77	15782.83	5	54.4 ± 2.8	1.14	15	15	1.00
28	9.18	5438.14	422.54	20151.01	10	52.0 ± 3.1	1.24	23	26	0.88
29	9.10	2297.65	2074.84	13624.55	5	60.3 ± 5.9	1.21	23	23	1.00
30	8.50	5947.61	94.31	10171.32	4	59.4 ± 3.5	1.38	20	21	0.95
31	5.28	2986.01	858.19	17664.24	5	61.0 ± 3.0	1.30	16	17	0.94
32	4.76	13643.02	1393.01	26500.65	5	56.8 ± 1.9	1.20	24	30	0.80
33	4.60	5384.31	253.50	13731.47	5	59.9 ± 3.9	1.48	18	19	0.95
34	4.40	2982.04	192.68	17255.82	5	63.7 ± 4.0	2.15	21	21	1.00
35	3.54	11264.40	185.67	21861.83	2	54.7 ± 2.6	1.12	15	16	0.94
36	3.51	2663.46	1207.27	15242.68	6	57.4 ± 1.7	1.32	17	18	0.94
37	2.20	1089.23	1172.90	16050.33	4	62.4 ± 4.6	1.19	9	9	1.00

Isolation1 is given as distance to the nearest larger park
Isolation2 is given as distance to the largest unfragmented woodlot Laoshan (the regional species pool)
Distance represents the distance of the park to the city center
S_obs observed species richness; S_exp expected species richness; S_com survey completeness

Back to article page

ISSN: 2053-7166

Contact us

Submission enquiries: sathish.venkatesan@springernature.com
General enquiries: info@biomedcentral.com