Skip to main content

Table 1 The twenty SAR models compared in the model selection, including the number of parameters, general model shape, whether or not the model contains an asymptote, and the overall rank obtained based on the best fitting model, model generality and efficiency (see “Methods” section)

From: A global consistent positive effect of urban green area size on bird richness

Model

No. parameters

Model code

Model shape

Asymptotic nature

Overall rank

Linear

2

linear

Linear

No

1

Kobayashi

2

koba

Convex

No

2

Power

2

power

Convex

No

3

Exponential

2

expo

Convex

No

4

Extended Power 1

3

epm1

Convex/Sigmoida

No

5

Asymptotic

3

asymp

Convex

Yes

6

Monod

2

monod

Convex

Yes

7

Rational

3

ratio

Convex

Yes

8

Beta-P

4

betap

Sigmoid

Yes

9

Weibull-3

3

weibull3

Sigmoid

Yes

10

Morgan–Mercer–Flodin

3

mmf

Sigmoid

Yes

11

Logistic

3

heleg

Sigmoid

Yes

12

Weibull-4

4

weibull4

Sigmoid

Yes

13

Persistence Function 1

3

P1

Convex

No

14

Persistence Function 2

3

P2

Sigmoid

No

15

Extended Power 2

3

epm2

Sigmoid

No

16

Gompertz

3

gompertz

Sigmoid

Yes

17

Chapman–Richards

3

chapman

Sigmoid

Yes

18

Power Rosenzweig

3

power_R

Convex

No

19

Negative Exponential

2

negexpo

Convex

Yes

20

  1. aThe epm1 model can be either convex or sigmoidal in shape depending on the parameter values