Skip to main content

Table 2 The performance of PGLS models predicting the extinction risk of Chinese endemic birds

From: Correlates of extinction risk in Chinese endemic birds

Model description

K

AICc

∆AICc

w i

Adjusted R2

GRS + HV + HPD

5

187.37

0.00

0.3124

0.4693

Body size + GRS + HV + HPD

6

188.16

0.79

0.2101

0.4725

GRS + clutch size + HV + HPD

6

188.47

1.11

0.1796

0.4702

Body size + GRS + clutch size + HV + HPD

7

189.42

2.06

0.1117

0.4727

Body size + GRS + HPD

5

190.62

3.25

0.0614

0.4147

GRS + HPD

4

191.14

3.77

0.0474

0.4094

GRS + clutch size + HPD

5

191.40

4.04

0.0415

0.4184

Body size + clutch size + GRS + HPD

6

191.69

4.32

0.0360

0.4179

GRS + clutch size + HV

5

209.70

22.34

4.40 × 10−6

0.2823

GRS + HV

4

210.58

23.21

2.85 × 10−6

0.2620

Body size + clutch size + GRS + HV

6

211.93

24.56

1.45 × 10−6

0.2727

Body size + GRS + HV

5

212.72

25.36

9.73 × 10−7

0.2524

Clutch size +  HV  +  HPD

5

216.18

28.82

1.73 × 10−7

0.2166

Clutch size + GRS

4

216.32

28.95

1.61 × 10−7

0.1661

GRS

3

217.56

30.20

8.66 × 10−8

0.1334

Body size + clutch size + GRS

5

217.60

30.23

8.51 × 10−8

0.1592

Body size + GRS

4

217.67

30.31

8.18 × 10−8

0.1877

HV + HPD

4

218.25

30.88

6.14 × 10−8

0.1814

Body size + clutch size + HV + HPD

6

218.42

31.05

5.65 × 10−8

0.2060

Clutch size + HV

4

218.70

31.34

4.89 × 10−8

0.1764

Clutch size + HPD

4

219.96

32.60

2.61 × 10−8

0.1189

Body size + HV + HPD

5

220.41

33.04

2.08 × 10−8

0.1705

Body size + clutch size + HV

5

220.94

33.57

1.60 × 10−8

0.1646

HV

3

221.33

33.96

1.32 × 10−8

0.1331

Body size + clutch size + HPD

5

221.69

34.32

1.10 × 10−8

0.1090

HPD

3

222.25

34.89

8.29 × 10−9

0.0729

Body size + HPD

4

222.38

35.01

7.79 × 10−9

0.1344

Body size + HV

4

223.50

36.14

4.44 × 10−9

0.1212

Clutch size

3

224.24

36.87

3.07 × 10−9

0.0521

Body size + clutch size

4

225.95

38.58

1.31 × 10−9

0.0413

Body size

3

226.93

39.56

8.01 × 10−10

0.0653

  1. The two best models that included and excluded geographic range size were highlighted in italics
  2. GRS geographic range size, HV hunting vulnerability; HPD human population density