Skip to main content

Table 3 Tibetan Snowcock occupancy (ψ) models

From: Habitat use and diel activity pattern of the Tibetan Snowcock (Tetraogallus tibetanus): a case study using camera traps for surveying high-elevation bird species

Model

ΔAICc

AICc weight

No. par.

(‒2LL)

ψ (± SE)

(a)

     

 ψ (EVI, ELE, ROD, SED, SLO)

0.000

0.150

7

− 753.453

0.830 (± 0.073)

 ψ (EVI, ELE, RID, ROD, SED, SLO)

0.297

0.129

8

− 752.405

0.826 (± 0.073)

 ψ (ELE, ROD, SED, SLO)

1.152

0.084

6

− 755.197

0.789 (± 0.072)

 ψ (ELE, DTRI, ROD, SLO)

1.212

0.081

6

− 755.231

0.765 (± 0.084)

 ψ (EVI, ELE, DTRI, ROD, SLO)

1.289

0.078

7

− 754.098

0.932 (± 0.066)

 ψ (EVI, ELE, ROD, SLO)

1.417

0.074

6

− 755.330

0.812 (± 0.098)

 ψ (EVI, ELE, DTRI, ROD, SED, SLO)

1.446

0.073

8

− 752.980

0.837 (± 0.072)

 ψ (ELE, DTRI, ROD, SED, SLO)

1.494

0.071

7

− 754.200

0.799 (± 0.072)

 ψ (ELE, ROD, SLO)

1.542

0.069

5

− 756.534

0.761 (± 0.078)

 ψ (ELE, RID, ROD, SED, SLO)

1.629

0.066

7

− 754.267

0.776 (± 0.074)

 ψ (EVI, ELE, DTRI, RID, ROD, SED, SLO)

1.652

0.065

9

− 750.859

0.819 (± 0.075)

 ψ (ELE, DTRI, RID, ROD, SED, SLO)

1.828

0.060

8

− 753.171

0.770 (± 0.074)

 ψ (.)

22.413

2

− 770.245

0.707 (± 0.053)

Site covariates

Summed model weights

(b)

 

 ELE

1.000

 SLO

1.000

 ROD

1.000

 SED

0.697

 EVI

0.569

 DTRI

0.429

 RID

0.321

  1. (a) We list all models whose ΔAICc ≤ 2, null model, and present AICc weight, number of parameters (No. par.), twice the negative log likelihood (− 2LL) and estimated occupancy rate (ψ). (b) Summed model weight of each site covariates in the equivalent models. The key for the covariate codes used is given in Table 1