Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Comparison of habitat variable measured on Grey Peacock-pheasant used locations (n = 48 locations), display scrapes (n = 112 locations), and available location (n = 132 locations)

From: Spatial distribution of display sites of Grey Peacock-pheasant in relation to micro-habitat and predators during the breeding season

Variable Variable description Median Mann U test
Used location Display scrape Available location 1a 2b 3c
Slp Slope (°) 21.50 15 24.00 0.003 < 0.001 0.001
Asp Aspect (°) 248 265 270 0.15 0.40 0.05
Ele Elevation (m) 906.50 852 879 0.23 0.18 0.03
TreeCCS Tree canopy closure (%) 91.50 91 93 0.02 0.03 0.96
VertD Vertical dense (%) 76 28.50 72.00 0.09 < 0.001 < 0.001
BA Tree basal area (m2) 0.77 0.77 2.45 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.49
DENTR Density of trees (number of trees/m2) (DBH ≥ 4.5 cm, height > 1.30 m) 0.08 0.10 0.08 0.81 < 0.001 < 0.001
DENSPL Density of sapling (number of saplings/m2) (DBH ≤ 4.5 cm, height > 1.30 m) 0.23 0.27 0.23 < 0.001 0.002 0.02
DENSDL Density of seedlings (number of seedlings/m2) (height < 1.30 m) 3.02 3.18 3.18 0.63 0.75 0.69
DENVI Density of vines (number of vines/m2) 0.008 0.01 0.006 0.06 < 0.001 0.07
DENINS Density of insects (number of insects/m2) 10.03 6.37 13.69 0.005 < 0.001 0.04
DENFRU Density of fruits (number of fruits/m2) 3.66 15.92 25.80 < 0.001 0.03 < 0.001
  1. 1a: p value between used locations versus available locations
  2. 2b: p value between display scrape locations versus available locations
  3. 3c: p value between used locations versus scrape locations of Grey Peacock-pheasant