Table 2 Model selection results, ranked by change in Akaike’s Information Criterion (ΔAICc) adjusted for small sample sizes and Akaike weights (w i ), used to evaluate influences on summer waterbird species richness in 38 subsidence lakes in Huainan and Fuyang, Anhui, China, 2016
Models | AIC | AICc | ΔAICc | w i |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Isolation + area + disturbance | − 136.0 | − 135.29 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
Area + isolation + disturbance + state + age | − 134.0 | − 132.13 | 3.17 | 0.16 |
Disturbance | − 127.2 | − 127.09 | 8.21 | 0.01 |
Area | − 127.0 | − 126.89 | 8.41 | 0.01 |
Area + isolation | − 126.9 | − 126.56 | 8.74 | 0.01 |
Age + state + disturbance | − 125.1 | − 124.39 | 10.90 | 0.00 |
Isolation | − 123.2 | − 123.09 | 12.21 | 0.00 |
State | − 121.5 | − 121.39 | 13.91 | 0.00 |
Age + state | − 121.7 | − 121.36 | 13.94 | 0.00 |
Age | − 121.3 | − 121.19 | 14.11 | 0.00 |